Search and filter source-backed AI laws, regulations, standards, guidance and consultations. Each record shows its status, key dates, verification state and official source.
Strategie der Bundesregierung für Künstliche Intelligenz – Artificial Intelligence Mission Austria 2030 (AIM AT 2030)
Adopted in August 2021, AIM AT 2030 sets three objectives: broad use of AI oriented to the common good and fundamental rights, Austria as a research and innovation location, and competitiveness of the Austrian technology and business location. It lists fields of action including trustworthy AI, public administration, skills, data and infrastructure, with an implementation and monitoring structure.
Adopted 25 Aug 2021Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Launched in July 2020, the charter commits signatory government agencies to transparency (plain-English explanations of how algorithms are used), partnership with Māori (Te Tiriti), people-focused use, data fit for purpose, privacy, ethics and human rights safeguards, human oversight and channels for challenge, applied through a risk matrix for high-impact algorithms. Around 30 agencies have signed; a 2021 review recommended stronger implementation.
Adopted 28 Jul 2020Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Beijing: Several Measures for Promoting the Innovation and Development of General Artificial Intelligence
北京市促进通用人工智能创新发展的若干措施
Twenty-one measures on compute, data, models, application scenarios and an "inclusive and prudent" approach to regulation and ethics for general-purpose AI in Beijing.
Adopted 23 May 2023Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
The Bletchley Declaration by countries attending the AI Safety Summit, 1–2 November 2023
Signed by countries including the United States, China, the EU, India, Japan and Brazil, the declaration recognises the opportunities of AI and the risks of frontier models, commits signatories to cooperate on identifying AI safety risks and building risk-based policies, and launched the summit series continued in Seoul (2024) and Paris (2025) and the network of AI safety institutes.
Adopted 1 Nov 2023Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
A Blueprint for Greece's AI Transformation – report of the AI Advisory Committee
Delivered in November 2024, the Advisory Committee's report proposes a national AI strategy: public-sector AI deployment, AI in health, education and agriculture, sovereign Greek language models, compute, skills, regulatory sandboxes and governance aligned with the EU AI Act.
Adopted 19 Nov 2024Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Catalonia AI Strategy 2030 (Estratègia Catalunya IA 2030)
Estratègia Catalunya IA 2030
A five-year strategy with up to €1 billion and 90 actions across eight areas: infrastructure, talent, research, business adoption, the public sector, ethics, digital society and international projection. It replaces the Catalonia.AI strategy of February 2020.
Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Jordanian Charter of Artificial Intelligence Ethics
The charter sets ethical principles for the development and use of AI in Jordan, including human dignity, fairness, transparency, accountability, safety, privacy and sustainability, addressed to public and private organisations.
Adopted 1 Aug 2022Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Концепция развития искусственного интеллекта на 2024–2029 годы
Approved by government decree in July 2024, the concept sets targets for AI infrastructure (supercomputing, data), talent, adoption in the public sector and economy, a national AI platform and regulatory development that led to the 2025 AI law.
Adopted 24 Jul 2024Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Концепция за развитието на изкуствения интелект в България до 2030 г.
Adopted in December 2020, the concept sets a framework for AI in Bulgaria to 2030 in line with the EU coordinated plan: research and infrastructure, skills, data, adoption in business and public administration, and trustworthy, ethical AI.
Adopted 16 Dec 2020Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Maroc Digital 2030: national digital strategy with an artificial intelligence pillar
Launched in September 2024, Digital Morocco 2030 sets targets for digital public services, the digital economy and talent, with an AI component covering a national AI centre, sovereign compute and data, sector use cases and governance, and announces a national AI strategy and legal framework.
Adopted 25 Sep 2024Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Етичке смернице за развој, примену и употребу поуздане и одговорне вештачке интелигенције
Adopted in March 2023, the guidelines set principles and requirements for trustworthy and responsible AI in Serbia (human agency, safety, privacy, transparency, non-discrimination, societal well-being, accountability), with self-assessment questions for developers and users, drawing on the EU ethics guidelines and the UNESCO recommendation.
Adopted 23 Mar 2023Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Federal Council decision on the regulation of artificial intelligence: ratification of the Council of Europe Convention and sector-specific adjustments
On 12 February 2025 the Federal Council decided how Switzerland will regulate AI: it will ratify the Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI and implement it mainly through targeted changes to existing law where needed (for example transparency, data protection and non-discrimination), avoid a horizontal AI act, and complement legislation with non-binding measures such as self-regulation and agreements with industry. Federal departments were tasked to prepare a consultation draft by the end of 2026.
Adopted 12 Feb 2025Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Finland's Age of Artificial Intelligence: Turning Finland into a leading country in the application of AI (objective and recommendations for measures)
The 2017 report of the steering group appointed by the Minister of Economic Affairs proposed eight key actions to make Finland a leader in applying AI: enhancing business competitiveness, using data in all sectors, faster adoption, top-level expertise and talent, bold decisions and investments, the best public services, new cooperation models and a human-centred approach. It launched the national AI programme continued in the 2019 final report and the AI 4.0 programme.
Adopted 23 Oct 2017Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
The Flemish government's AI programme, funding research, business adoption through VLAIO, and awareness, training and ethics. The first plan (2019) had about €32 million a year; a second cycle for 2024-2028 was approved in 2024.
Adopted 22 Mar 2019Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Algoritmeregister van de Nederlandse overheid (Government Algorithm Register)
A public register in which Dutch government organisations describe the algorithms they use that affect citizens: purpose, legal basis, data, human oversight, risks and contact points. Launched in December 2022 and extended since, it aims to make automated decision-making by government transparent and contestable. Ministries were asked to publish all impactful and high-risk algorithms.
Adopted 21 Dec 2022Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Overheidsbrede visie generatieve AI (Government-wide vision on generative AI)
Adopted in January 2024, the vision sets the government's position on generative AI: a human-centric, safe and fair approach, provisional restrictions on using non-contracted generative AI tools with government data, investment in Dutch and European open models (GPT-NL), and actions on skills, procurement and supervision. It complements the AI Act and the government's AI strategy.
Adopted 18 Jan 2024Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Adopted in November 2020, seven guidelines steer the use of AI by the federal administration: putting people at the centre, conditions for development and use, transparency and explainability, accountability, security, active participation in AI governance, and involvement of stakeholders.
Adopted 25 Nov 2020Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Hong Kong Ethical Artificial Intelligence Framework (Digital Policy Office)
Guiding principles, leading practices and an AI assessment for government AI projects, with a three-line governance model in which the IT board or chief information officer reviews high-risk AI. It was updated for generative AI.
Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Methodology for the Risk and Impact Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Systems from the Point of View of Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (HUDERIA)
Adopted by the CAI in November 2024, HUDERIA is a structured methodology for assessing risks and impacts of AI systems on human rights, democracy and the rule of law across the lifecycle: context-based risk analysis, stakeholder engagement, risk and impact assessment, and mitigation planning with iterative review. It supports implementation of the Framework Convention and can be used by public and private organisations.
Adopted 28 Nov 2024Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Anything a government or standards body has actually issued: acts, regulations, executive orders, rules, national strategies, frameworks, guidance, codes of practice, voluntary standards and open consultations. Each record states which of those it is, whether it binds anyone, and links the official source it was read from.
Are these records legally verified?
A record is marked verified only after a named reviewer has opened its official source and confirmed each field. Anything that has not been through that carries "pending review" on the record itself, and the data-health document reports the current totals. Nothing here is legal advice.
How current is the information?
Every record carries the date its source document was published and the date it was last checked. A record not re-checked within the freshness window set by the verification policy is flagged as stale rather than quietly presented as current.
Can I reuse this data?
Yes. The records are published under CC BY 4.0 with attribution, and are available as CSV, newline-delimited JSON and a read-only REST API that needs no key. Cite the record URL, the date accessed and the official source alongside it.
