Search and filter source-backed AI laws, regulations, standards, guidance and consultations. Each record shows its status, key dates, verification state and official source.
WA Government Artificial Intelligence Policy and Assurance Framework
Each WA public sector entity nominates an AI Accountable Officer and self-assesses its AI and automated decision-making systems; higher-risk, Digital Capability Fund-funded or large projects go to the WA AI Advisory Board, whose advice is non-binding, and use cases are recorded in a government AI register.
Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Draft principles for a Thai AI law released for public hearing by MDES and ETDA. They propose a risk-based structure that distinguishes prohibited and high-risk AI, duties for providers and deployers, human oversight, incident reporting and a regulatory sandbox, while leaving sector regulators to set proportionate rules. The draft merges the 2022 ONDE royal decree draft and the 2023 ETDA promotion act draft.
Adopted 11 Jun 2025Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
A AED 13 billion strategy to make Abu Dhabi a fully AI-native government by 2027, with targets including more than 200 AI solutions, full migration to a sovereign cloud and Chief Digital and AI Officers in every entity.
Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
ACT Government Artificial Intelligence Policy (Version 1.0) and AI Assurance Framework
Aligns ACT government use of AI with Australia's AI Ethics Principles and the national assurance framework; in-scope initiatives are reviewed by an ACT AI Advisory Group, and standard AI features of commercial products are exempt.
Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Aðgerðaáætlun um gervigreind 2024–2026 (Action plan on artificial intelligence)
The 2024–2026 action plan implements Iceland's AI policy with measures on AI in public services, the Icelandic language in AI systems, skills and research, ethics and security, and preparation for the EU AI Act.
Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Färdplan för Sverige – AI-kommissionens slutbetänkande (SOU 2024:94)
The government-appointed AI Commission's final report sets out a roadmap for Sweden with around 75 proposals: a national AI task force and data factory, compute and skills investment, AI in public administration and health care, access to data for research and innovation, and measures to make the most of the EU AI Act. It estimates costs and proposes a funding envelope over several years.
Adopted 26 Nov 2024Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Стратегија развоја вештачке интелигенције у Републици Србији за период 2025–2030
Adopted in 2025, the second national AI strategy sets goals to 2030 on research and talent, AI in the economy and public administration, data and compute infrastructure, trustworthy AI and alignment with the EU AI Act and the Council of Europe convention, and the preparation of an AI law.
Adopted 1 Mar 2025Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Strategy for the development of artificial intelligence technologies until 2030 (Presidential Resolution, October 2024)
The 2024 resolution approves a strategy to 2030 to raise the AI services market, deploy AI in public administration and priority sectors, build data centres and datasets, train specialists and adopt ethical principles and standards for AI.
Adopted 14 Oct 2024Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Strategy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in the Republic of Tajikistan for the period up to 2040
Approved by government decree in 2021, the strategy sets long-term goals for AI research, education, infrastructure and use in the economy and public administration to 2040.
Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
SDAIA's AI Ethics Principles set out ethical principles and associated controls for entities developing, deploying or affected by AI systems in Saudi Arabia, covering fairness, privacy and security, humanity, social and environmental benefit, reliability and safety, transparency, and accountability. The document assigns roles and responsibilities and marks certain controls as binding for public entities. The 2025 edition updates the September 2023 version 1.0.
Adopted 1 May 2025Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
The AI Guidelines for Business consolidate Japan's previous AI R&D, utilisation and governance guidelines into a single non-binding document addressed to AI developers, providers and business users. They set common guiding principles (such as human-centricity, safety, fairness, privacy, security, transparency and accountability) and describe agile governance practices, with an appendix of practical methods and checklists. The guidelines are updated periodically; version 1.0 was issued in April 2024 and version 1.2 in March 2026.
Adopted 19 Apr 2024Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
The AI Opportunities Action Plan is an independent report by Matt Clifford commissioned by the government, containing 50 recommendations organised under three aims: laying foundations (compute, data, skills and regulation), driving AI adoption across the public and private sectors, and securing homegrown frontier AI capability. The government published a response accepting the recommendations and treats the plan as its roadmap for AI-led growth.
Adopted 13 Jan 2025Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
AI Cymru: Shaping a Smarter, Fairer, More Prosperous Wales (AI plan for Wales)
A plan built on four pillars (economic growth, educating Wales, equitable delivery, excellence and trust) with a Welsh Government Office for AI and a Strategic AI Advisory Group. It proposes no legislation.
Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
AI Portugal 2030: Portuguese National Initiative on Digital Skills – Artificial Intelligence strategy
Published in 2019 under the INCoDe.2030 initiative, AI Portugal 2030 sets objectives for research, skills, public administration, industry adoption and international positioning, with priority application areas such as natural language, mobility, energy and health, and a commitment to ethical and trustworthy AI.
Adopted 1 Jun 2019Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Israel's Policy on Artificial Intelligence Regulation and Ethics
Adopted in December 2023 after public consultation, the policy sets Israel's approach: sector-specific regulation by existing regulators, a risk-based approach, preference for soft tools (standards, self-regulation, sandboxes) over binding rules at this stage, alignment with OECD principles, and common ethical principles (growth and sustainable development, human-centricity, equality, transparency, safety, accountability, privacy). It establishes an AI policy coordination centre and an expert advisory forum.
Adopted 17 Dec 2023Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Magyarország Mesterséges Intelligencia Stratégiája 2020–2030
Adopted in September 2020, the strategy sets goals to 2030 on data economy, AI research and education, public-sector and industrial adoption, and transformative programmes such as an AI-driven public administration and language technology, coordinated with the AI Coalition of companies, universities and public bodies.
Adopted 8 Sep 2020Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Artificial Intelligence Strategy of the Republic of Azerbaijan for 2025–2028 (presidential decree, March 2025)
Approved by presidential decree in March 2025, the strategy sets goals for AI in public administration, the economy and education, data and computing infrastructure, talent, ethical and safe AI, and a coordinating institutional structure, with an action plan to 2028.
Adopted 19 Mar 2025Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Jordanian Artificial Intelligence Strategy and Implementation Roadmap 2023–2027
Adopted in 2023, the strategy sets priorities on AI governance and ethics, talent and research, adoption in government services and priority sectors, data infrastructure, and international cooperation, with an implementation roadmap and indicators to 2027.
Adopted 1 Aug 2023Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Strategie Künstliche Intelligenz der Bundesregierung (AI Strategy of the Federal Government, 2018, updated 2020)
The federal AI strategy, adopted in November 2018 and updated in December 2020, sets out how Germany intends to make AI research, transfer and use competitive while anchoring AI in fundamental rights and the common good. The 2020 update raised planned federal funding to around EUR 5 billion to 2025 and added priorities on pandemic response, sustainability, health, mobility and AI in the public sector. It commits to a European approach to AI regulation and to trustworthy-AI standards.
Adopted 15 Nov 2018Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
AI – Here for Good: National Artificial Intelligence Strategy for Ireland (2021, refreshed 2024)
Ireland's national AI strategy, first published in July 2021 and refreshed in November 2024 to reflect the EU AI Act and generative AI, is organised around building public trust, leveraging AI for economic and societal benefit, and enablers such as data, infrastructure, skills and governance. The refresh sets out Ireland's AI Act implementation model, public-sector AI guidelines and an AI advisory council.
Adopted 8 Jul 2021Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)Official source
Anything a government or standards body has actually issued: acts, regulations, executive orders, rules, national strategies, frameworks, guidance, codes of practice, voluntary standards and open consultations. Each record states which of those it is, whether it binds anyone, and links the official source it was read from.
Are these records legally verified?
A record is marked verified only after a named reviewer has opened its official source and confirmed each field. Anything that has not been through that carries "pending review" on the record itself, and the data-health document reports the current totals. Nothing here is legal advice.
How current is the information?
Every record carries the date its source document was published and the date it was last checked. A record not re-checked within the freshness window set by the verification policy is flagged as stale rather than quietly presented as current.
Can I reuse this data?
Yes. The records are published under CC BY 4.0 with attribution, and are available as CSV, newline-delimited JSON and a read-only REST API that needs no key. Cite the record URL, the date accessed and the official source alongside it.
