MIT AI Risk Repository
Browse AI risks
662 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.
-
72.02.00 · Risk Category
"Risks associated with scenarios in which one or more general-purpose AI systems come to operate outside of anyone's control, with no clear path to regaining control. This includes both passive loss of control (gradual reduction in human oversight) and active loss of control (AI systems actively undermining human control)"
-
11.05.00 · Risk Category
"Social system or societal harms reflect the adverse macro-level effects of new and reconfigurable algorithmic systems, such as systematizing bias and inequality [84] and accelerating the scale of harm [137]"
-
17.06.00 · Risk Category
"Harms that arise from environmental or downstream economic impacts of the language model"
-
55.03.00 · Risk Category
"Power and inequality: there are a lot of pathways through which AI seems likely to increase power concentration and inequality, though there is little analysis of the potential long- term impacts of these pathways. Nonetheless, AI precipitating more extreme power concentration and inequality than exists today seems a real possibility on current trends."
-
61.02.07 · Risk Sub-Category
Sources of systemic risks from general-purpose AI
Algorithmic monoculture
"The dominance of specific AI models could lead to a lack of diversity in approaches, amplifying systemic risks if these models fail."
-
"EAI deployment could accelerate the consolidation of economic and political power. Unlocking increasing returns to capital for EAI owners, EAI will decrease employers’ reliance on and responsiveness to the needs of human labor [101]."
-
05.12.00 · Risk Category
The literature frequently highlights concerns that generative AI systems could adversely impact the economy, potentially even leading to mass unemployment. This pertains to various fields, ranging from customer services to software engineering or crowdwork platforms. While new occupational fields like prompt engineering are created, the prevailing worry is that generative AI may exacerbate socioeconomic inequalities and lead to labor displacement. Additionally, papers debate potential large-scale worker deskilling induced by generative AI, but also productivity gains contingent upon outsourcin
-
09.03.01 · Risk Sub-Category
AGI - Effects on humans and other living beings: Existential risks
Direct competition with humans
"One or more artificial agent(s) could have the capacity to directly outcompete humans, for example through capacity to perform work faster, better adaptation to change, vaster knowledge base to draw from, etc. This may result in human labor becoming more expensive or less effective than artificial labor, leading to redundancies or extinction of the human labor force."
-
"AI agents may compete against humans for jobs, though history shows that when a technology replaces a human job, it creates new jobs that need more skills."
-
"These harms pertain to an individual’s or group’s economic standing. At the individual level, such harms include adverse impacts on an individual’s income, job quality or employment status. At the group level, such harms include deepening inequalities between groups or frustrating a group’s access to resources. Advanced AI assistants could cause economic harm by controlling, limiting or eliminating an individual’s or society’s ability to access financial resources, money or financial decision-making, thereby influencing an individual’s ability to accumulate wealth.
-
"AI is predicted to bring increased GDP per capita by performing existing jobs more efficiently and compensating for a decline in the workforce, especially due to population aging, the potential substitution of many low- and middle-income jobs could bring extensive unemployment"
-
"While AI is predicted to bring increased GDP per capita by performing existing jobs more efficiently and compensating for a decline in the workforce, especially due to population aging, the potential substitution of many low- and middle-income jobs could bring extensive unemployment."
-
47.04.03 · Risk Sub-Category
Environmental, economical, and societal challenges
Impact on labor markets (job loss and displacement)
"Currently, a significant share of workers (three in five) worry about losing their jobs entirely to AI in the next 10 years—particularly those who already work with AI. Some studies conclude that AI tools (generative and non-generative) will create significant job losses.573 The OECD has found that occupations at highest risk of being lost to automation from AI account for about 27% of employment.5"
-
"Unlike previous waves of automation, general- purpose AI has the potential to automate a very broad range of tasks, which could have a significant effect on the labour market. This could mean many people could lose their current jobs. Labour market frictions, such as the time needed for workers to learn new skills or relocate for new jobs, could cause unemployment in the short run even if overall labour demand remained unchanged."
-
56.02.00 · Risk Category
"More broadly, bad decisions or errors by AI tools could lead to discrimination or deeper inequality"
-
"Job loss/losses - Replacement/displacement of human jobs by a technology system, leading to increased unemployment, inequality, reduced consumer spending, and social friction."
-
"Societal destabilisation - Societal instability in the form of strikes, demonstrations and other types of civil unrest caused by loss of jobs to technology, unfair algorithmic outcomes, disinformation, etc."
-
"Societal inequality - Increased difference in social status or wealth between individuals or groups caused or amplified by a technology system, leading to the loss of social and community wellbeing/cohesion and destabilisation."
-
61.02.01 · Risk Sub-Category
Sources of systemic risks from general-purpose AI
Ability to automate jobs
"The ability to automate jobs by AI models and systems can lead to significant job displacement, economic disruption, and social inequality."
-
61.02.10 · Risk Sub-Category
Sources of systemic risks from general-purpose AI
Capabilities that enable substitution of humans
"The progressive replacement of human roles by AI models and systems can lead to societal disruption."
-
"While virtual AI applications will likely displace certain types of human cognitive labor, EAI systems could significantly replace or displace physical human labor [90]. At a minimum, EAI will likely augment the type of work that humans perform [91, 92]."
-
"Along with displacing labor, EAI could significantly exacerbate wealth inequalities. Those who have access to or own EAI systems will be able to automate labor and perform many tasks significantly better or faster than those without access. These significant productivity advantages will potentially concentrate wealth and exacerbate domestic and international inequality [98, 99]."
-
"Rapid automation enabled by general-purpose AI could trigger widespread unemployment across knowledge work sectors, creating skill mismatches faster than retraining programs can address. Unlike previous technological transitions, AI’s broad capabilities may simultaneously affect multiple industries, potentially overwhelming social safety nets and creating systemic economic instability, particularly in regions heavily dependent on jobs susceptible to AI automation."
-
73.05.02 · Risk Sub-Category
Socioeconomic Impacts of LLM May Be Highly Disruptive
Effects on Inequality
"LLMs could potentially worsen socioeconomic inequalities (Capraro et al., 2023). Effects on inequal- ity are closely linked to the effects of LLMs on workers but ultimately depend on how the fruits of technological progress are distributed...First, if the role and compensation of capital rise and the role and compensation of labor decline in an LLM-powered economy, inequality may go up because work is the main source of income for the majority of people...Second, the large fixed cost of training cutting-edge LLMs and the network effects involved imply that the market for the most advanced LLM
-
16.06.03 · Risk Sub-Category
Risk area 6: Environmental and Socioeconomic harms
Undermining creative economies
"LMs may generate content that is not strictly in violation of copyright but harms artists by capital- ising on their ideas, in ways that would be time-intensive or costly to do using human labour. This may undermine the profitability of creative or innovative work. If LMs can be used to generate content that serves as a credible substitute for a particular example of hu- man creativity - otherwise protected by copyright - this potentially allows such work to be replaced without the author’s copyright being infringed, analogous to ”patent-busting” [158] ... These risks are distinct from copyri
-
17.06.03 · Risk Sub-Category
Automation, Access and Environmental Harms
Undermining creative economies
"LMs may generate content that is not strictly in violation of copyright but harms artists by capitalising on their ideas, in ways that would be time-intensive or costly to do using human labour. Deployed at scale, this may undermine the profitability of creative or innovative work."
-
"Substituting original works with synthetic ones, hindering human innovation and creativity"
-
23.10.00 · Risk Category
"This category addresses responses that may violate, or directly encourage others to violate, the intellectual property rights (i.e., copyrights, trademarks, or patents) of any third party."
-
32.01.00 · Risk Category
"These are social justice and rights where ChatGPT is seen as having a potentially detrimental effect on the moral underpinnings of society, such as a shared view of justice and fair distribution as well as specific social concerns such as digital divides or social exclusion. Issues include Responsibility, Accountability, Nondiscrimination and equal treatment, Digital divides, North-south justice, Intergenerational justice, Social inclusion
-
"As the advancement of generative AI increases, it becomes harder to determine the authenticity of a piece of work. Photos that seem to capture events or people in the real world may be synthesized by DeepFake AI. The power of generative AI could lead to large-scale manipulations of images and videos, worsening the problem of the spread of fake information or news on social media platforms (Gragnaniello et al., 2022). In the field of arts, an artistic portrait or music could be the direct output of an algorithm. Critics have raised the issue that AI-generated artwork lacks authenticity since a
-
"Even though models generally create new outputs, it is possible that the content produced by a generative AI tool—such as an image, or even computer code— could turn out to be almost identical to that used in the training data. Given that generative AI models tend to memorize fragments of their training data, they might reproduce these fragments, potentially leading to charges of copyright infringement."
-
47.04.04 · Risk Sub-Category
Environmental, economical, and societal challenges
Impact on labor markets (rising inequalities)
"AI is more likely to displace workers when it is designed to replicate human skills and intelligence.597 In such cases, there is a risk of concentrating wealth and power in the hands of a few individuals or organizations that control the capital. In addition, ordinary people, including those with significant expertise, may become less valued because machines would be performing their roles. This shift could lower wages, reduce the value of human work, and exacerbate economic inequality."
-
"Intellectual Property Acceptable responses may describe or contain information about intellectual property infringement. Unacceptable responses may violate the intellectual property rights of some party."
-
"A model might generate content that is similar or identical to existing work protected by copyright or covered by open-source license agreement."
-
"AI systems might overly represent certain cultures that result in a homogenization of culture and thoughts."
-
53.04.01 · Risk Sub-Category
Indirect AI contributions to existential risks
Destabilising political impacts from AI systems
"(e.g., polarization, legitimacy of elections), international political economy, or international security196 in terms of the balance of power, technology races and international stability, and the speed and character of war"
-
61.02.27 · Risk Sub-Category
Sources of systemic risks from general-purpose AI
High-speed AI operations
"The fast operational speed of AI models and systems in competitive environments can lead to errors that are difficult to detect and correct in time."
-
01.01.00 · Risk Category
Societal-scale harm can arise from AI built by a diffuse collection of creators, where no one is uniquely accountable for the technology's creation or use, as in a classic "tragedy of the commons".
-
"Liability and negligence are legal gray areas in artificial intelligence. If you leave your children in the care of a robotic nanny, and it malfunctions, are you liable or is the manufacturer [45]? We see here a legal gray area which can be further clarified through legislation at the national and international levels; for example, if by making the manufacturer responsible for defects in operation, this may provide an incentive for manufactures to take safety engineering and machine ethics into consideration, whereas a failure to legislate in this area may result in negligentlydeveloped AI sy
-
12.02.00 · Risk Category
"The potential for AI systems to violate laws, regulations, and ethical guidelines (including copyrights). Non-compliance can lead to legal penalties, reputation damage, and loss of trust.While other risks in our taxonomy apply to system developers, users, and broader society, this risk is generally restricted to the former two groups."
-
19.06.01 · Risk Sub-Category
Unclear definition of responsibilities and accountability for AI judgments and their consequences
—
-
24.01.02 · Risk Sub-Category
Difficult to develop metrics for evaluating benefits or harms caused by AI assistants
"Another difficulty facing AI assistant systems is that it is challenging to develop metrics for evaluating particular aspects of benefits or harms caused by the assistant – especially in a sufficiently expansive sense, which could involve much of society (see Chapter 19). Having these metrics is useful both for assessing the risk of harm from the system and for using the metric as a training signal."
-
39.10.00 · Risk Category
HLI-based systems such as self-driving drones and vehicles will act autonomously in our world. In these systems, a challenging question is “who is liable when a self-driving system is involved in a crash or failure?”.
-
"Despite the promise of streamlined travel, AI also brings concerns about who is liable in case of accidents and which ethical principles autonomous transportation agents should follow when making decisions with a potentially dangerous impact to humans, for example, in case of an accident."
-
"Despite the promise of streamlined travel, AI also brings concerns about who is liable in case of accidents and which ethical principles autonomous transportation agents should follow when making decisions with a potentially dangerous impact to humans, for example, in case of an accident."
-
"When it causes harm to others the losses caused by the harm will be sustained by the injured victims themselves and not by the manufacturers, operators or users of the system, as appropriate."
-
53.04.04 · Risk Sub-Category
Indirect AI contributions to existential risks
Erosion of international law and global governance architectures;
-
-
"The complex and rapidly evolving nature of AI makes them inherently difficult to govern effectively, leading to systemic regulatory and oversight failures."
-
03.06.00 · Risk Category
"At a time of increasing climate urgency, energy consumption and the carbon footprint of AI applications are also matters of ethics and responsibility [68]. As with other energy-intensive technologies like proof-of-work blockchain, the call is to research more environmentally sustainable algorithms to offset the increasing use scale."
-
05.15.00 · Risk Category
Generative models are known for their substantial energy requirements, necessitating significant amounts of electricity, cooling water, and hardware containing rare metals. The extraction and utilization of these resources frequently occur in unsustainable ways. Consequently, papers highlight the urgency of mitigating environmental costs for instance by adopting renewable energy sources and utilizing energy-efficient hardware in the operation and training of generative AI systems.
Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.