AI policy change log

Dated, source-backed updates: what changed, the practical impact, the status after the change and the official source. Urgent and high-impact items are separated from routine updates.

Reset

Weekly digest

Dated, source-linked AI policy changes and upcoming application dates, once a week. No marketing.

Double opt-in; one-click unsubscribe in every email. Choose jurisdictions

All changes (139)

Indonesia Routine

Government completes inter-ministerial finalisation of the roadmap and ethics draft regulations

Milestone recorded for Rancangan Peraturan Presiden tentang Peta Jalan Kecerdasan Artifisial Nasional 2026-2029 (Indonesia): Government completes inter-ministerial finalisation of the roadmap and ethics draft regulations. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Japan Routine

Ver1.2 published

Milestone recorded for AI Guidelines for Business (Japan): Ver1.2 published. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

AI Guidelines for Business Ver1.2 published Source-linked · checked 11 Sep 2026
Indonesia Routine

Inter-ministerial plenary discusses draft Perpres on National AI Roadmap 2026-2029

Milestone recorded for Rancangan Peraturan Presiden tentang Peta Jalan Kecerdasan Artifisial Nasional 2026-2029 (Indonesia): Inter-ministerial plenary discusses draft Perpres on National AI Roadmap 2026-2029. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Ontario (Canada) Routine In force

Ontario job postings must disclose AI screening

The Working for Workers Four Act provisions took effect requiring employers with 25 or more employees to state in public job postings whether AI is used to screen, assess or select applicants.

Practical impact: Add an AI-use statement to every public job posting for Ontario roles.

Texas (United States) High In force

Texas TRAIGA takes effect

The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act became effective, with Attorney General enforcement after a 60-day cure period.

Practical impact: Prohibited-intent screening, government disclosure and sandbox applications are now live requirements in Texas.

California (United States) High In force

California SB 53 frontier-model transparency duties become operative

Most provisions of the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act took effect, including the duty to publish a frontier AI framework and report critical safety incidents.

Practical impact: Large frontier developers should now have a published framework and incident-reporting process.

New York (United States) High Adopted

New York signs the RAISE Act on frontier-model safety

The Governor signed the Responsible AI Safety and Education Act with agreed amendments aligning it to California SB 53, requiring large frontier developers to publish safety protocols and report critical incidents, reportedly effective 1 January 2027.

Practical impact: Frontier-model developers serving New York should align safety documentation with California SB 53 to satisfy both laws; verify the enrolled chapter text.

Vietnam Routine

National Assembly passes the Law on Artificial Intelligence, creating a binding framework

Milestone recorded for National Strategy on Research, Development and Application of Artificial Intelligence to 2030 (Vietnam): National Assembly passes the Law on Artificial Intelligence, creating a binding framework. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Australia High Under consultation

Australia releases a National AI Plan signalling an existing-law approach

The National AI Plan set out the government's AI agenda and indicated that AI would be governed by strengthening existing laws rather than a standalone AI Act. The status of the 2024 mandatory-guardrails proposal must be confirmed.

Practical impact: Australian organisations should not expect a cross-economy AI Act in the near term; existing-law compliance and the voluntary standard remain the baseline.

European Union High Partially applicable

European Commission proposes Digital Omnibus adjustments to AI Act timelines

The Commission proposed a "Digital Omnibus" package that would, among other changes, link the application of certain high-risk obligations to the availability of standards and support tools, with later backstop dates. This is a proposal and requires adoption by the European Parliament and Council.

Practical impact: High-risk timelines may move; organisations should keep planning against Article 113 dates until an amendment is adopted.

Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.