Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

AI policy change log

Dated, source-backed updates: what changed, the practical impact, the status after the change and the official source. Urgent and high-impact items are separated from routine updates.

Filter changes
Reset

Weekly digest

Dated, source-linked AI policy changes and upcoming application dates, once a week. No marketing.

Double opt-in; one-click unsubscribe in every email. Choose jurisdictions

All changes (341)

Download as CSV
Australia High at the time Under consultation

Australia releases a National AI Plan signalling an existing-law approach

The National AI Plan set out the government's AI agenda and indicated that AI would be governed by strengthening existing laws rather than a standalone AI Act. The status of the 2024 mandatory-guardrails proposal must be confirmed.

Practical impact: Australian organisations should not expect a cross-economy AI Act in the near term; existing-law compliance and the voluntary standard remain the baseline.

Australian mandatory guardrails proposal National AI Plan Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
European Union High at the time Partially applicable

European Commission proposes Digital Omnibus adjustments to AI Act timelines

The Commission proposed a "Digital Omnibus" package that would, among other changes, link the application of certain high-risk obligations to the availability of standards and support tools, with later backstop dates. This is a proposal and requires adoption by the European Parliament and Council.

Practical impact: High-risk timelines may move; organisations should keep planning against Article 113 dates until an amendment is adopted.

EU AI Act AI Act policy page (Digital Omnibus proposal) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Kazakhstan High at the time Adopted

Kazakhstan signs Central Asia's first law on artificial intelligence

The President signed the Law on Artificial Intelligence, introducing a risk-based classification, duties for owners and operators of AI systems, labelling of AI-generated content and a national AI platform.

Practical impact: Companies deploying AI in Kazakhstan should classify systems and prepare labelling and risk-management documentation; confirm the in-force date on the official legal database.

Law on Artificial Intelligence (2025) Ministry of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Development Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
India Urgent at the time Partially applicable

India notifies the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025

The DPDP Rules were notified with phased commencement, starting the countdown for consent, notice, security and breach-notification obligations under the DPDP Act 2023.

Practical impact: Organisations using personal data of Indian residents in AI should plan compliance against the phased dates.

India DPDP Act Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
India Routine Guidance

MeitY releases the India AI Governance Guidelines

The guidelines set out principles, an institutional framework and recommendations favouring existing-law enforcement, voluntary commitments and risk-based oversight over a new AI statute.

Practical impact: Indian AI developers and deployers have a reference for regulator expectations; no new binding duties.

India AI Governance Guidelines India AI Governance Guidelines Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Chile Routine

Senate assigns bill (second constitutional stage) to the Future Challenges Committee

Milestone recorded for Proyecto de ley que regula los sistemas de inteligencia artificial, Boletín 16821-19 (Chile): Senate assigns bill (second constitutional stage) to the Future Challenges Committee. Recorded from the official source listed.

Proyecto de ley que regula los sistemas de inteligencia artificial, Boletín 16821-19 Senate assigns bill (second constitutional stage) to the Future Challenges Committee Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
California (United States) High at the time Adopted

California enacts the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (SB 53)

The Governor signed SB 53, requiring large frontier developers to publish safety frameworks and transparency reports and to report critical safety incidents, operative 1 January 2026.

Practical impact: Frontier-model developers doing business in California need a published safety framework and incident reporting process.

California SB 53 SB 53 Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Italy Urgent at the time In force

Italy publishes Law 132/2025, the first national AI law in the EU

Law No. 132 of 23 September 2025 was published in the Official Gazette and entered into force on 10 October 2025, designating AgID and ACN as national AI authorities, adding sector rules for health, work, professions, justice and public administration, an under-14 consent rule and a deepfake offence.

Practical impact: Organisations in Italy must combine EU AI Act compliance with the national sector rules and watch the delegated decrees due within twelve months.

Law No. 132/2025 on artificial intelligence Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Colorado (United States) High at the time Adopted

Colorado delays the AI Act effective date to 30 June 2026

SB 25B-004, passed in a special session, moved the effective date of SB 24-205 from 1 February 2026 to 30 June 2026 without changing its substance.

Practical impact: Developers and deployers gained about five months; further amendments were expected in the 2026 session.

Colorado AI Act SB25B-004 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
China Routine

Opinions issued by the State Council (document dated 21 August 2025)

Milestone recorded for Opinions of the State Council on Deepening the Implementation of the 'AI Plus' Action (China): Opinions issued by the State Council (document dated 21 August 2025). Recorded from the official source listed.

Opinions of the State Council on Deepening the Implementation of the 'AI Plus' Action Opinions issued by the State Council (document dated 21 August 2025) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
European Union Urgent at the time Partially applicable

EU AI Act general-purpose AI, governance and penalty provisions start to apply

Chapter V obligations for general-purpose AI model providers, the governance chapter, notified-body provisions and most penalty provisions became applicable.

Practical impact: Providers placing general-purpose models on the EU market must now hold documentation, a copyright policy and a training-content summary.

EU AI Act Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 113(b) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Nepal High at the time Adopted

Nepal's Council of Ministers approves the National AI Policy

The cabinet approved the National Artificial Intelligence Policy 2082, Nepal's first national AI policy. Exact approval date and the published text need confirmation from MoCIT.

Practical impact: Organisations in Nepal should expect implementing measures, institutions and possible legislation to follow.

Nepal National AI Policy Ministry of Communication and Information Technology Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Bahrain Routine

iGA publicly launches the National Policy for the Use of AI and adopts the GCC AI ethics manual

Milestone recorded for General Policy for the Use of Artificial Intelligence (Bahrain): iGA publicly launches the National Policy for the Use of AI and adopts the GCC AI ethics manual. Recorded from the official source listed.

General Policy for the Use of Artificial Intelligence iGA publicly launches the National Policy for the Use of AI and adopts the GCC AI ethics manual Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
United States Routine In force

White House releases America's AI Action Plan

The Action Plan required by EO 14179 set out federal priorities on innovation, infrastructure and international leadership, with accompanying executive orders on federal procurement of AI models and data-centre permitting.

Practical impact: Signals federal deregulatory direction and procurement expectations for AI vendors.

EO 14179 America's AI Action Plan Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
European Union High at the time Partially applicable

European Commission publishes the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice

The final Code of Practice for general-purpose AI models was published, with chapters on transparency, copyright, and safety and security for models with systemic risk, ahead of the 2 August 2025 application date.

Practical impact: Model providers can sign the Code to demonstrate compliance with Articles 53 and 55.

EU AI Act General-Purpose AI Code of Practice Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
New Zealand Routine Adopted

New Zealand publishes its first national AI strategy and rules out a standalone AI act

MBIE released the Strategy for Artificial Intelligence and Responsible AI Guidance for Businesses, opting for a light-touch approach based on existing law and OECD principles.

Practical impact: Businesses in New Zealand should apply the responsible-AI guidance and privacy law; no new AI statute is planned.

New Zealand AI Strategy (2025) New Zealand's Strategy for Artificial Intelligence Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.

Frequently asked questions

What counts as a change?

A dated development in the life of an instrument: adoption, entry into force, an amendment, a withdrawal, a gazette notice, the opening or closing of a consultation, or guidance being issued under it. Each entry says what changed and what it means in practice, and links the official source.

How far back does the change log go?

To 2017, which is where the earliest recorded national AI strategies sit. Entries are grouped by year, and the whole log is available as an RSS feed and through the API.

Will I be told when something changes?

Follow a jurisdiction or an instrument and you will be alerted when a change is recorded against it. There is also a digest you can subscribe to. Both are free.