Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

AI policy changes in 2025

54 recorded changes across 33 jurisdictions, each linked to an official source. 16 marked urgent or high-impact.

Changes
54
Jurisdictions
33
Urgent / high
16
Instruments affected
45
New York (United States) High at the time Adopted

New York signs the RAISE Act on frontier-model safety

The Governor signed the Responsible AI Safety and Education Act with agreed amendments aligning it to California SB 53, requiring large frontier developers to publish safety protocols and report critical incidents, reportedly effective 1 January 2027.

Practical impact: Frontier-model developers serving New York should align safety documentation with California SB 53 to satisfy both laws; verify the enrolled chapter text.

New York RAISE Act (frontier model safety) S6953-B Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Vietnam Routine

National Assembly passes the Law on Artificial Intelligence, creating a binding framework

Milestone recorded for National Strategy on Research, Development and Application of Artificial Intelligence to 2030 (Vietnam): National Assembly passes the Law on Artificial Intelligence, creating a binding framework. Recorded from the official source listed.

Australia High at the time Under consultation

Australia releases a National AI Plan signalling an existing-law approach

The National AI Plan set out the government's AI agenda and indicated that AI would be governed by strengthening existing laws rather than a standalone AI Act. The status of the 2024 mandatory-guardrails proposal must be confirmed.

Practical impact: Australian organisations should not expect a cross-economy AI Act in the near term; existing-law compliance and the voluntary standard remain the baseline.

Australian mandatory guardrails proposal National AI Plan Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
European Union High at the time Partially applicable

European Commission proposes Digital Omnibus adjustments to AI Act timelines

The Commission proposed a "Digital Omnibus" package that would, among other changes, link the application of certain high-risk obligations to the availability of standards and support tools, with later backstop dates. This is a proposal and requires adoption by the European Parliament and Council.

Practical impact: High-risk timelines may move; organisations should keep planning against Article 113 dates until an amendment is adopted.

EU AI Act AI Act policy page (Digital Omnibus proposal) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Kazakhstan High at the time Adopted

Kazakhstan signs Central Asia's first law on artificial intelligence

The President signed the Law on Artificial Intelligence, introducing a risk-based classification, duties for owners and operators of AI systems, labelling of AI-generated content and a national AI platform.

Practical impact: Companies deploying AI in Kazakhstan should classify systems and prepare labelling and risk-management documentation; confirm the in-force date on the official legal database.

Law on Artificial Intelligence (2025) Ministry of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Development Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
India Urgent at the time Partially applicable

India notifies the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025

The DPDP Rules were notified with phased commencement, starting the countdown for consent, notice, security and breach-notification obligations under the DPDP Act 2023.

Practical impact: Organisations using personal data of Indian residents in AI should plan compliance against the phased dates.

India DPDP Act Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
India Routine Guidance

MeitY releases the India AI Governance Guidelines

The guidelines set out principles, an institutional framework and recommendations favouring existing-law enforcement, voluntary commitments and risk-based oversight over a new AI statute.

Practical impact: Indian AI developers and deployers have a reference for regulator expectations; no new binding duties.

India AI Governance Guidelines India AI Governance Guidelines Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Chile Routine

Senate assigns bill (second constitutional stage) to the Future Challenges Committee

Milestone recorded for Proyecto de ley que regula los sistemas de inteligencia artificial, Boletín 16821-19 (Chile): Senate assigns bill (second constitutional stage) to the Future Challenges Committee. Recorded from the official source listed.

Proyecto de ley que regula los sistemas de inteligencia artificial, Boletín 16821-19 Senate assigns bill (second constitutional stage) to the Future Challenges Committee Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
California (United States) High at the time Adopted

California enacts the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (SB 53)

The Governor signed SB 53, requiring large frontier developers to publish safety frameworks and transparency reports and to report critical safety incidents, operative 1 January 2026.

Practical impact: Frontier-model developers doing business in California need a published safety framework and incident reporting process.

California SB 53 SB 53 Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Italy Urgent at the time In force

Italy publishes Law 132/2025, the first national AI law in the EU

Law No. 132 of 23 September 2025 was published in the Official Gazette and entered into force on 10 October 2025, designating AgID and ACN as national AI authorities, adding sector rules for health, work, professions, justice and public administration, an under-14 consent rule and a deepfake offence.

Practical impact: Organisations in Italy must combine EU AI Act compliance with the national sector rules and watch the delegated decrees due within twelve months.

Law No. 132/2025 on artificial intelligence Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Colorado (United States) High at the time Adopted

Colorado delays the AI Act effective date to 30 June 2026

SB 25B-004, passed in a special session, moved the effective date of SB 24-205 from 1 February 2026 to 30 June 2026 without changing its substance.

Practical impact: Developers and deployers gained about five months; further amendments were expected in the 2026 session.

Colorado AI Act SB25B-004 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
China Routine

Opinions issued by the State Council (document dated 21 August 2025)

Milestone recorded for Opinions of the State Council on Deepening the Implementation of the 'AI Plus' Action (China): Opinions issued by the State Council (document dated 21 August 2025). Recorded from the official source listed.

Opinions of the State Council on Deepening the Implementation of the 'AI Plus' Action Opinions issued by the State Council (document dated 21 August 2025) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
European Union Urgent at the time Partially applicable

EU AI Act general-purpose AI, governance and penalty provisions start to apply

Chapter V obligations for general-purpose AI model providers, the governance chapter, notified-body provisions and most penalty provisions became applicable.

Practical impact: Providers placing general-purpose models on the EU market must now hold documentation, a copyright policy and a training-content summary.

EU AI Act Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 113(b) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Nepal High at the time Adopted

Nepal's Council of Ministers approves the National AI Policy

The cabinet approved the National Artificial Intelligence Policy 2082, Nepal's first national AI policy. Exact approval date and the published text need confirmation from MoCIT.

Practical impact: Organisations in Nepal should expect implementing measures, institutions and possible legislation to follow.

Nepal National AI Policy Ministry of Communication and Information Technology Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Bahrain Routine

iGA publicly launches the National Policy for the Use of AI and adopts the GCC AI ethics manual

Milestone recorded for General Policy for the Use of Artificial Intelligence (Bahrain): iGA publicly launches the National Policy for the Use of AI and adopts the GCC AI ethics manual. Recorded from the official source listed.

General Policy for the Use of Artificial Intelligence iGA publicly launches the National Policy for the Use of AI and adopts the GCC AI ethics manual Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
United States Routine In force

White House releases America's AI Action Plan

The Action Plan required by EO 14179 set out federal priorities on innovation, infrastructure and international leadership, with accompanying executive orders on federal procurement of AI models and data-centre permitting.

Practical impact: Signals federal deregulatory direction and procurement expectations for AI vendors.

EO 14179 America's AI Action Plan Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
European Union High at the time Partially applicable

European Commission publishes the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice

The final Code of Practice for general-purpose AI models was published, with chapters on transparency, copyright, and safety and security for models with systemic risk, ahead of the 2 August 2025 application date.

Practical impact: Model providers can sign the Code to demonstrate compliance with Articles 53 and 55.

EU AI Act General-Purpose AI Code of Practice Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
New Zealand Routine Adopted

New Zealand publishes its first national AI strategy and rules out a standalone AI act

MBIE released the Strategy for Artificial Intelligence and Responsible AI Guidance for Businesses, opting for a light-touch approach based on existing law and OECD principles.

Practical impact: Businesses in New Zealand should apply the responsible-AI guidance and privacy law; no new AI statute is planned.

New Zealand AI Strategy (2025) New Zealand's Strategy for Artificial Intelligence Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Texas (United States) High at the time Adopted

Texas signs the Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA), effective 1 January 2026

The Governor signed HB 149, banning AI intended to manipulate people into self-harm or crime, government social scoring and certain biometric uses, requiring government AI disclosure, and creating a sandbox and AI council with Attorney General enforcement.

Practical impact: Developers and deployers serving Texas should screen for prohibited intents and document NIST-aligned governance to use the statutory defences.

Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA) HB 149 (89R) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Thailand Routine

ETDA opens public hearing on draft AI law principles (comments to 24 June 2025)

Milestone recorded for (Draft) Principles of the Law on Artificial Intelligence (Thailand): ETDA opens public hearing on draft AI law principles (comments to 24 June 2025). Recorded from the official source listed.

(Draft) Principles of the Law on Artificial Intelligence ETDA opens public hearing on draft AI law principles (comments to 24 June 2025) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Ghana Routine

Minister announces development of National AI Strategy and stakeholder consultation

Milestone recorded for Ghana National Artificial Intelligence Strategy (Ghana): Minister announces development of National AI Strategy and stakeholder consultation. Recorded from the official source listed.

Ghana National Artificial Intelligence Strategy Minister announces development of National AI Strategy and stakeholder consultation Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Mexico Routine

Initiative published in the Gaceta Parlamentaria and turned to committee

Milestone recorded for Iniciativa con proyecto de decreto por el que se expide la Ley Federal para el Desarrollo Ético, Soberano e Inclusivo de (Mexico): Initiative published in the Gaceta Parlamentaria and turned to committee. Recorded from the official source listed.

Philippines Routine

DOST proposes a successor National AI Strategy for the Philippines (NAIS-PH)

Milestone recorded for National AI Strategy Roadmap 2.0 (Philippines): DOST proposes a successor National AI Strategy for the Philippines (NAIS-PH). Recorded from the official source listed.

National AI Strategy Roadmap 2.0 DOST proposes a successor National AI Strategy for the Philippines (NAIS-PH) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
United States High at the time In force

OMB issues M-25-21 and M-25-22 on federal AI use and acquisition

OMB replaced the 2024 memoranda with new requirements for agency AI governance, use-case inventories, high-impact AI practices and AI procurement.

Practical impact: Vendors to US federal agencies need documentation and testing support aligned with the high-impact AI practices.

OMB M-25-21 OMB Memoranda M-25-21 and M-25-22 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Chile Routine

Action plan progress report: 78% of 177 initiatives implemented or completed (as of April 2025)

Milestone recorded for Política Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial (Chile): Action plan progress report: 78% of 177 initiatives implemented or completed (as of April 2025). Recorded from the official source listed.

Política Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial Action plan progress report: 78% of 177 initiatives implemented or completed (as of April 2025) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Brazil Routine

Sent to the Chamber of Deputies for review; special committee subsequently created

Milestone recorded for Projeto de Lei nº 2338/2023 (Brazil): Sent to the Chamber of Deputies for review; special committee subsequently created. Recorded from the official source listed.

Projeto de Lei nº 2338/2023 Sent to the Chamber of Deputies for review; special committee subsequently created Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Spain High at the time Proposed

Spain approves a draft law implementing the EU AI Act with mandatory AI-content labelling

The Council of Ministers approved the preliminary draft law on the good use and governance of AI, allocating supervision to AESIA and sector authorities, setting national penalties and treating unlabelled AI-generated content as a serious infringement.

Practical impact: Companies operating in Spain should prepare labelling of synthetic content and expect AESIA as the main supervisor.

Draft law on good use and governance of AI AESIA Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Switzerland Routine Adopted

Swiss Federal Council chooses sector rules and the Council of Europe convention over an AI act

The Federal Council decided to ratify the Council of Europe Framework Convention and implement it through targeted sector-specific changes plus self-regulation, with a consultation draft due by the end of 2026.

Practical impact: Swiss organisations will not face a horizontal AI law; transparency, data-protection and non-discrimination amendments are the ones to watch.

Federal Council AI regulatory approach (2025) Federal Council wants to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on AI Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
United Kingdom Routine

AI Playbook published, superseding the Generative AI Framework for HMG

Milestone recorded for Artificial Intelligence Playbook for the UK Government (United Kingdom): AI Playbook published, superseding the Generative AI Framework for HMG. Recorded from the official source listed.

Artificial Intelligence Playbook for the UK Government AI Playbook published, superseding the Generative AI Framework for HMG Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
European Union Urgent at the time Partially applicable

EU AI Act prohibited practices and AI-literacy duties start to apply

Chapters I and II of the AI Act became applicable, banning the Article 5 practices and requiring providers and deployers to ensure AI literacy under Article 4. The Commission published guidelines on prohibited practices on 4 February 2025.

Practical impact: Prohibited-use screening and staff AI training are now legal requirements for anyone using AI in the EU.

EU AI Act Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 113(a) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
United States High at the time In force

US Executive Order 14179 sets a new federal AI policy after EO 14110 was revoked

Three days after Executive Order 14148 revoked the 2023 "Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy AI" order, EO 14179 directed an AI Action Plan within 180 days and a review of prior agency actions.

Practical impact: Federal AI requirements derived from EO 14110 were placed under review; vendors should check what agencies still require.

EO 14179 Executive Order 14179 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
South Korea Routine

Promulgated as Act No. 20676

Milestone recorded for Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of a Foundation for Trust (South Korea): Promulgated as Act No. 20676. Recorded from the official source listed.

AI Basic Act Promulgated as Act No. 20676 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.