Which legal duties does "AI interaction and use disclosure notices" satisfy?

It is recorded as satisfying 14 and supporting 3 duties across Colorado (United States), European Union, New York (United States), Singapore, South Korea, Texas (United States), United Kingdom and Australia. A mapping means the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for; the official text decides whether it is enough.

What evidence shows this control is operating?

AI interaction or use notice, Notice catalogue and Notice wording approval. Owner: Product owner. Frequency: at launch and on material change.

Process Owner: Product owner At launch and on material change

AI interaction and use disclosure notices

Tells people, in plain language and at the right moment, that they are interacting with an AI system, that AI is being used in a decision about them or that their data feeds an AI system.

Source-linked Context file

Duties satisfied: 14; done properly, does the work
Duties supported: 3; contributes; the duty needs more
Jurisdictions: 8
Evidence items: 3

How is it implemented?

The organisation keeps a catalogue of the situations in which people meet its AI systems and, for each, approves a notice: a conversational banner, a pre-decision statement, a privacy-notice section or a product label. Notices say what the system does, what it is for, what it means for the person and where to ask questions or opt out where that right exists. Legal, product and accessibility reviewers sign off wording and placement, the live text is versioned, and a periodic check confirms that notices still appear where the system is used. Public notices about AI use are kept in a single, findable place.

Which legal duties does it serve?

Satisfies means the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports means it contributes but the duty needs more. The official text decides; open it before relying on either.

Colorado (United States) 3 duties

satisfies Legal requirement
Deployers must publish a statement about the high-risk AI systems they use
Colorado AI Act · C.R.S. 6-1-1703(5) · applies from 30 Jun 2026

Organisation-level public statement rather than per-interaction notice.
satisfies Legal requirement confidence high
Notify consumers and explain adverse consequential decisions
Colorado AI Act · C.R.S. 6-1-1703(4) · applies from 30 Jun 2026

Pre-decision notice with purpose, nature and contact details.
satisfies Legal requirement confidence high
Deployers and developers must disclose to consumers that they are interacting with an AI system
Colorado AI Act · C.R.S. 6-1-1704 · applies from 30 Jun 2026

Point-of-interaction notice.

European Union 5 duties

satisfies Legal requirement confidence high
Disclose AI interaction and label synthetic content
EU AI Act · Article 50 · applies from 2 Aug 2026

User-facing AI interaction notices.
satisfies Legal requirement confidence high
Employers must inform workers and their representatives before using high-risk AI at work
EU AI Act · Article 26(7) · applies from 2 Aug 2026

Workforce-facing notice before go-live.
satisfies Legal requirement confidence high
Deployers must tell natural persons that a high-risk AI system is used in decisions about them
EU AI Act · Article 26(11) · applies from 2 Aug 2026

Notice to decision subjects at the point of the decision process.
satisfies Legal requirement confidence high
Deployers of emotion recognition or biometric categorisation must inform exposed persons
EU AI Act · Article 50(3) · applies from 2 Aug 2026

Notice to persons exposed to the system.
supports Legal requirement
Use high-risk AI as instructed, monitor it and inform affected people
EU AI Act · Article 26 · applies from 2 Aug 2026

Informing workers and affected people that a high-risk system is used.

New York (United States) 2 duties

satisfies Legal requirement
Employers and employment agencies must publish a summary of the bias audit results
NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools) · NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(a)(2); 6 RCNY Section 5-302 · applies from 5 Jul 2023

Public posting of audit results is a disclosure to candidates.
satisfies Legal requirement confidence high
Employers and employment agencies must notify candidates and employees before an automated tool is used
NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools) · NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(b)(1) and (b)(2); 6 RCNY Section 5-303 · applies from 5 Jul 2023

Advance notice to candidates with the assessed criteria.

Singapore 1 duty

satisfies Legal requirement confidence high
Notify individuals about the use of personal data in AI recommendations and decisions
PDPC AI advisory guidelines · Advisory guidelines, section on notification obligation

AI-specific disclosures in privacy notices and in product.

South Korea 1 duty

satisfies Legal requirement confidence high
AI business operators must notify users in advance that a product or service runs on high-impact or generative AI
Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of a Foundation for Trust · Article 31(1) · applies from 22 Jan 2026

Advance user notice of AI-based service.

Texas (United States) 2 duties

satisfies Legal requirement confidence high
Government agencies must disclose to consumers that they are interacting with an AI system
Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA) · Business and Commerce Code Section 551.051 · applies from 1 Jan 2026

Point-of-interaction notice in plain language.
satisfies Legal requirement confidence high
Health-care providers must disclose the use of AI in patient services
Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA) · Business and Commerce Code Section 551.051 · applies from 1 Jan 2026

Patient-facing disclosure before first service.

United Kingdom 2 duties

satisfies Voluntary
Provide appropriate transparency and explainability
UK AI regulation framework · Principle 2, Part 3

Public AI use notices.
supports Legal requirement
Apply safeguards to solely automated decisions with significant effects
ICO AI guidance · UK GDPR Article 22 as amended by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025

Telling people a solely automated decision was made.

Australia 1 duty

supports Voluntary confidence high
Test and monitor systems, enable human control, and be transparent with users (guardrails 4 to 6)
Australian Voluntary AI Safety Standard · Guardrails 4, 5 and 6

Guardrail 5: informing end users.

What evidence shows it is operating?

Evidence this control produces
Evidence	Type	What it shows
AI interaction or use notice	Disclosure or notice	The approved text and placement shown to people for each interaction or decision point.
Notice catalogue	Register entry	Where each notice appears, its version and its owner.
Notice wording approval	Approval or sign-off record

Owner: Product owner. Frequency: at launch and on material change.

Which risks does it address?

Subdomains of the MIT AI Risk Repository, with the incidents the AI Incident Database has recorded under each. Counts are live; they say how often a risk has materialised, not how well this control prevents it.

7.4 Lack of transparency or interpretability AI system safety, failures, & limitations5 incidents · 42 risk entries
4.3 Fraud, scams, and targeted manipulation Malicious actors412 incidents · 77 risk entries
5.2 Loss of human agency and autonomy Human-Computer Interaction4 incidents · 47 risk entries

Which standards clauses does it correspond to?

Clause numbers only. A reference means the standard asks for overlapping work, so evidence may be reusable; it never means the standard discharges a legal duty.

Framework references
Framework	Reference	Confidence
ISO/IEC 42001	Annex A.8.2, A.8.5	medium
NIST AI RMF	MEASURE 2.8; GOVERN 5.1	medium
OECD AI Principles	Principle 1.3 Transparency and explainability	high

Cite this record

AIPolicyTracker (2026). “AI interaction and use disclosure notices”. https://aipolicytracker.org/controls/ai-interaction-and-use-disclosure (accessed 24 September 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.

Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.

Governance card

Kind: Process
Owner: Product owner
Frequency: At launch and on material change
Binding duties: 15 of 17
Review status: Pending human review

Confirm which of the duties above reach you (applicability check).
Assign the owner and the frequency.
Operate the control and keep the evidence listed.
Re-check when a duty changes (change log).

Related controls

Decision explanation, human review and appeal route Process
Privacy and data-protection controls for AI Process
Synthetic content labelling and provenance marking Technical measure

Report a correction How we verify

Run this control as a tracked task with Certifyi, a separate compliance execution platform. AIPolicyTracker itself stays open and independent.

Frequently asked questions

Which legal duties does "AI interaction and use disclosure notices" satisfy?: It is recorded as satisfying 14 and supporting 3 duties across Colorado (United States), European Union, New York (United States), Singapore, South Korea, Texas (United States), United Kingdom and Australia. A mapping means the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for; the official text decides whether it is enough.
What evidence shows this control is operating?: AI interaction or use notice, Notice catalogue and Notice wording approval. Owner: Product owner. Frequency: at launch and on material change.