Collect and use personal information only with consent and for the stated purpose
Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder Nepal Privacy Act 2075, Chapter on collection and protection of personal information (reviewer to cite sections)
What this label means
- Verified
- — a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
- Pending review
- — linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
- Source-linked
- — linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
On this page 9 sections
In brief
Collect and use personal information only with consent and for the stated purpose is a legal requirement under the Nepal Privacy Act 2075 in Nepal (Chapter on collection and protection of personal information (reviewer to cite sections)). The record carries 1 evidence example and mappings to 1 framework.
- Instrument
- Nepal Privacy Act 2075
- Jurisdiction
- Nepal
- Nature
- Legal requirement
- Source reference
- Chapter on collection and protection of personal information (reviewer to cite sections)
- Who it binds
- Provider / developer, Deployer / user organisation, Public authority / government body
- Evidence examples
- 1
- Framework mappings
- ISO/IEC 42001:2023
- Controls that meet it
- 2
- Official source
- Open official text
- Verification
- Pending review · source-linked
What does it require?
Personal information may be collected only by authorised persons for a lawful purpose with the individual's consent, and must not be used or disclosed for other purposes without consent, subject to statutory exceptions. AI systems trained on or processing personal data of people in Nepal must respect these limits.
Practical action
Document consent and purpose for any Nepal personal data used in AI training or inference.
Who does it apply to?
All public bodies and private entities processing personal information in Nepal.
- Sectors
- Cross-sector / all sectors
Which controls meet this duty?
Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.
-
satisfiesProcessData protection officer · once per ai systemPrivacy and data-protection controls for AI
Serves 13 recorded duties · evidence: Data protection impact assessment for an AI system, AI data-flow and legal-basis record, Privacy notice section on AI use
Consent and purpose documentation for Nepal personal data.
-
supportsProcessModel development lead · at launch and on material changeTraining-data provenance and copyright register
Serves 4 recorded duties · evidence: Training source register, Copyright and rights-reservation policy, Public summary of training content
Source register records the basis for each training source.
Templates that cover this duty
Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.
- ISO/IEC 42001 Gap Assessment and Statement of Applicability
Assessment · XLSX · v3
- NIST AI RMF ↔ EU AI Act ↔ ISO/IEC 42001 Crosswalk
Crosswalk · XLSX · v3
- AI Data Governance Register
Register · XLSX and DOCX · v3
- AI Audit Evidence Tracker
Register · XLSX · v1
What evidence would a reviewer expect?
| Evidence | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Consent and purpose records | record |
Framework mappings
Original editorial crosswalks. They cite clause numbers only and reproduce no standard text; confidence reflects how direct the mapping is.
See every Nepal duty mapped this way →
| Framework | Reference | Note | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | Annex A controls on data for AI systems | Original editorial mapping. | low |
Frequently asked questions
Is this a legal requirement?
Yes. It is a legal requirement under Nepal Privacy Act 2075 (Chapter on collection and protection of personal information (reviewer to cite sections)).
Who must comply with this obligation?
All public bodies and private entities processing personal information in Nepal.
What evidence shows compliance?
A reviewer would expect: Consent and purpose records.
Which frameworks map to this obligation?
It is mapped to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A controls on data for AI systems. These are editorial crosswalks with a stated confidence, not official mappings.
Which controls satisfy this obligation?
Privacy and data-protection controls for AI; Training-data provenance and copyright register.
What should an organisation do in practice?
Document consent and purpose for any Nepal personal data used in AI training or inference.
Cite this record
AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Collect and use personal information only with consent and for the stated purpose (Nepal Privacy Act 2075)” [AIPT-OBL-0052, not yet verified]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0052 (accessed 27 October 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.
Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0052: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.
Cite the official text alongside it: Individual Privacy Act, 2075 (2018), Nepal Law Commission, https://lawcommission.gov.np/.
BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_collectandusepersonalinf,
author = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
title = {{Collect and use personal information only with consent and for the stated purpose (Nepal Privacy Act 2075)}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/nepal-privacy-act-consent-and-purpose}},
url = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/nepal-privacy-act-consent-and-purpose},
urldate = {2026-10-27},
note = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 27 October 2026}
}
Change history
-
- Review status: verified → pending_review
Similar obligations in other instruments
- Deployers must use the provider's transparency information in their data protection impact assessment — EU AI Act, European Union
- Process personal data only with valid consent or a legitimate use, after notice — India DPDP Act, India
- Identify consent or an applicable PDPA exception before using personal data in AI — PDPC AI advisory guidelines, Singapore
- Employers and employment agencies must disclose the data collected and their retention policy for the tool — NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools), New York (United States)
Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.