AIPolicyTracker
ChecklistFree · no accountEU AI Act

EU AI Act Role and Risk Classifier

Answer six questions per system and the sheet returns the role, the risk tier and the date its duties apply, looked up from the dated milestones on the EU AI Act record.

Formats: XLSX · Version v1 · Built from dataset 7c0835db52c1 · CC BY 4.0. You may use, adapt and share this template, including commercially, with attribution to aipolicytracker.org.

What's inside

  • Classifier sheet: role, Annex III area, prohibited practice, safety component, GPAI and systemic-risk questions as dropdowns; tier and application date as formulas
  • Dates sheet: every dated milestone on the EU AI Act record, with status and confidence
  • Duties sheet: every recorded EU AI Act duty by role, with article reference

Dates: Dates are as recorded on the build date. EU AI Act: Dates below follow Article 113 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (the "Digital Omnibus on AI"), published in the Official Journal on 24 July 2026 and in force from 27 July 2026: the Chapter III high-risk obligations now apply from 2 December 2027 for stand-alone Annex III systems and from 2 August 2028 for AI embedded in Annex I products, while general application and the Article 50 transparency duties kept 2 August 2026. Recorded on 26 September 2026 from concordant secondary reporting; the amending regulation itself has not yet been read against the Official Journal by a reviewer here, so these dates are pending review.

Preview

The sheets and sections of version v1, as built. Columns marked ▾ have a dropdown; ƒ is a formula.

Sheet: Classifier · 10 columns · blank, 200 rows ready to fill
First rows of the Classifier sheet
SystemYour role ▾Annex III area (use case) ▾A prohibited practice? ▾Safety component of a regulated product (Annex I)? ▾A general-purpose AI model? ▾With systemic risk? ▾Risk tier ƒDuties apply from ƒNotes
Rows are yours to fill; the dropdowns, formulas and colour rules are already in place.

A first-pass classification from six questions. The Act's definitions have exceptions the sheet cannot ask about; confirm each high-risk or prohibited result against the record and the official text.

Sheet: Tiers · 3 columns · 6 rows from the records
First rows of the Tiers sheet
TierDuties apply fromMilestone on the record
Prohibited2025-02-02Prohibited practices milestone
High-risk2026-08-02Annex III high-risk milestone
High-risk (Annex I product)2026-08-02Annex I safety-component milestone
GPAI2025-08-02General-purpose AI milestone
GPAI with systemic risk2025-08-02General-purpose AI milestone
Minimal or limited risk2026-08-02Article 50 transparency milestone

The record notes: Dates below follow Article 113 of the adopted text. The European Commission proposed a "Digital Omnibus" package in November 2025 that would adjust the application dates for some high-risk obligations; a reviewer must confirm whether that proposal has been adopted and update the deadlines accordingly.

Sheet: Dates · 9 columns · 7 rows from the records
First rows of the Dates sheet
DateMilestoneInstrumentJurisdictionSource referenceStatusConfidenceNoteRecord
2024-08-01Entry into forceEU AI ActEuropean UnionArticle 113passedhighTwentieth day after publication in the Official Journal.https://aipolicytracker.org/policies/eu-ai-act
2025-02-02Prohibited practices and AI literacy apply (Chapters I and II)EU AI ActEuropean UnionArticle 113(a)passedhighArticle 5 bans and Article 4 literacy duties apply.https://aipolicytracker.org/policies/eu-ai-act
2025-08-02General-purpose AI, governance, notified bodies and penalties applyEU AI ActEuropean UnionArticle 113(b)passedhighChapter V (GPAI models), Chapter III Section 4, Chapter VII, Chapter XII (except Article 101) and Article 78 apply.https://aipolicytracker.org/policies/eu-ai-act
2026-08-02General application, including Annex III high-risk systems and Article 50 transparencyEU AI ActEuropean UnionArticle 113scheduledlowDefault application date for the remainder of the Regulation, as set in the adopted text. Secondary reporting indicates Article 113 was amended during 2026 and https://aipolicytracker.org/policies/eu-ai-act
2027-08-02High-risk AI as safety components of Annex I productsEU AI ActEuropean UnionArticle 113(c)scheduledlowArticle 6(1) obligations for AI in products covered by Annex I harmonisation legislation. Secondary reporting indicates this date moved under a 2026 amendment thttps://aipolicytracker.org/policies/eu-ai-act
2027-08-02General-purpose models placed on the market before 2 August 2025 must complyEU AI ActEuropean UnionArticle 111(3)scheduledmediumTransitional period for models already on the market.https://aipolicytracker.org/policies/eu-ai-act
Sheet: Duties by role · 14 columns · 44 rows from the records
First rows of the Duties by role sheet
DutyCategoryInstrumentJurisdictionWho it bindsNatureSource referenceApplies fromWhat it requiresEvidence a reviewer expectsISO/IEC 42001NIST AI RMFVerificationRecord
Do not deploy or provide AI for prohibited practicesProhibited practicesEU AI ActEuropean UnionProvider / developer, Deployer / user organisation, Public authority / government bodyLegal requirementArticle 52025-02-02Article 5 bans placing on the market, putting into service or using AI for listed practices, including subliminal or manipulative techniques that cause significProhibited-practice screening record; AI system inventoryClause 6.1.2 and Annex A control on AI system impact assessmentGOVERN 1.1, MAP 1.1Source-linkedhttps://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-prohibited-practices
Ensure AI literacy of staff operating AI systemsAI literacy and trainingEU AI ActEuropean UnionProvider / developer, Deployer / user organisationLegal requirementArticle 42025-02-02Providers and deployers must take measures to ensure, to their best extent, a sufficient level of AI literacy among their staff and other persons dealing with tAI literacy training programmeClause 7.2 Competence and 7.3 AwarenessGOVERN 2.2Source-linkedhttps://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-ai-literacy
Establish a risk management system for high-risk AIAI risk managementEU AI ActEuropean UnionProvider / developerLegal requirementArticle 92026-08-02Providers of high-risk AI systems must establish, implement, document and maintain a continuous, iterative risk-management system across the system's lifecycle:Risk register and treatment plan; Pre-market test reportsClauses 6.1.2, 6.1.3, 8.2, 8.3 and Annex A controls on AI riskMAP, MEASURE and MANAGE functionsSource-linkedhttps://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-risk-management-system
Apply data governance and quality criteria to training, validation and testing dataData governance and qualityEU AI ActEuropean UnionProvider / developerLegal requirementArticle 102026-08-02High-risk AI systems that use data-driven techniques must be developed on training, validation and testing data sets meeting quality criteria: appropriate goverDataset documentation (datasheet); Bias examination reportAnnex A controls on data for AI systemsMAP 2.3, MEASURE 2.1, MEASURE 2.11Source-linkedhttps://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-data-governance
Draw up technical documentation before placing a high-risk system on the marketTechnical documentationEU AI ActEuropean UnionProvider / developerLegal requirementArticle 11 and Annex IV2026-08-02Technical documentation must be drawn up before a high-risk system is placed on the market or put into service and kept up to date. It must demonstrate complianAnnex IV technical fileClause 7.5 Documented information; Annex A control on system documentationGOVERN 1.4, MAP 3.xSource-linkedhttps://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-technical-documentation
Design high-risk systems to log events automaticallyRecord keeping and loggingEU AI ActEuropean UnionProvider / developer, Deployer / user organisationLegal requirementArticle 12; Article 26(6) for deployers2026-08-02High-risk AI systems must technically allow automatic recording of events (logs) over their lifetime to support traceability, post-market monitoring and operatiLogging specification and retention policyAnnex A control on event loggingMEASURE 2.x, MANAGE 4.1Source-linkedhttps://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-record-keeping

Duties this template covers (44)

Each is cited in the file with its source reference and a link back to the record.

See all 44 duties →

Legal basis

  • EU AI Act European Union · Partially applicable

Version history

Versions of EU AI Act Role and Risk Classifier
VersionBuiltDatasetWhat changed
v17c0835db52c1First version, built from dataset 7c0835db52c1.

Only the latest version is served. A rebuild that changes the content adds a version; a rebuild that does not is skipped.

Frequently asked questions

Is the EU AI Act Role and Risk Classifier free?
Yes. Download the XLSX without an account, under CC BY 4.0. You may use, adapt and share this template, including commercially, with attribution to aipolicytracker.org.
What is it generated from?
Version v1 was built on 26 September 2026 from dataset 7c0835db52c1: 51 recorded duties are cited in it, drawn from 1 instruments. Every row that cites a duty links to the record, and the record links to the official source.
How will I know when it changes?
The library is rebuilt daily. When a change to the records reaches this template it gets the next version, a changelog in the version history below, an entry in the AI policy updates hub and the templates feed, and a line in the weekly digest for subscribers of the templates topic.
Are the dates in it current?
Dates are as recorded on the build date. EU AI Act: Dates below follow Article 113 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (the "Digital Omnibus on AI"), published in the Official Journal on 24 July 2026 and in force from 27 July 2026: the Chapter III high-risk obligations now apply from 2 December 2027 for stand-alone Annex III systems and from 2 August 2028 for AI embedded in Annex I products, while general application and the Article 50 transparency duties kept 2 August 2026. Recorded on 26 September 2026 from concordant secondary reporting; the amending regulation itself has not yet been read against the Official Journal by a reviewer here, so these dates are pending review.
Does completing it make us compliant?
No. It is an informational resource, not legal advice; it helps produce the evidence a regulator, customer or auditor asks for. Whether a duty applies to you is a judgement the template cannot make.

Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.

Frequently asked questions

Is the EU AI Act Role and Risk Classifier free?
Yes. Download the XLSX without an account, under CC BY 4.0. You may use, adapt and share this template, including commercially, with attribution to aipolicytracker.org.
What is it generated from?
Version v1 was built on 26 September 2026 from dataset 7c0835db52c1: 51 recorded duties are cited in it, drawn from 1 instruments. Every row that cites a duty links to the record, and the record links to the official source.
How will I know when it changes?
The library is rebuilt daily. When a change to the records reaches this template it gets the next version, a changelog in the version history below, an entry in the AI policy updates hub and the templates feed, and a line in the weekly digest for subscribers of the templates topic.
Are the dates in it current?
Dates are as recorded on the build date. EU AI Act: Dates below follow Article 113 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (the "Digital Omnibus on AI"), published in the Official Journal on 24 July 2026 and in force from 27 July 2026: the Chapter III high-risk obligations now apply from 2 December 2027 for stand-alone Annex III systems and from 2 August 2028 for AI embedded in Annex I products, while general application and the Article 50 transparency duties kept 2 August 2026. Recorded on 26 September 2026 from concordant secondary reporting; the amending regulation itself has not yet been read against the Official Journal by a reviewer here, so these dates are pending review.
Does completing it make us compliant?
No. It is an informational resource, not legal advice; it helps produce the evidence a regulator, customer or auditor asks for. Whether a duty applies to you is a judgement the template cannot make.