Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

AI policy change log

Dated, source-backed updates: what changed, the practical impact, the status after the change and the official source. Urgent and high-impact items are separated from routine updates.

Filter changes
Reset

Weekly digest

Dated, source-linked AI policy changes and upcoming application dates, once a week. No marketing.

Double opt-in; one-click unsubscribe in every email. Choose jurisdictions

All changes (341)

Download as CSV
Ontario (Canada) Routine Adopted

Ontario enacts a framework for regulating public-sector AI use

Bill 194 received royal assent, enabling regulations on disclosure, accountability frameworks, risk management and prohibited uses of AI by Ontario public-sector entities.

Practical impact: Public bodies in Ontario should inventory AI systems ahead of regulations; vendors to government should expect disclosure requirements.

Ontario Enhancing Digital Security and Trust Act, 2024 (Bill 194) Bill 194 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Uruguay Routine

Strategy approved by the Strategic Committee for Public-Sector AI and Data

Milestone recorded for Estrategia Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial del Uruguay 2024-2030 (Uruguay): Strategy approved by the Strategic Committee for Public-Sector AI and Data. Recorded from the official source listed.

Estrategia Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial del Uruguay 2024-2030 Strategy approved by the Strategic Committee for Public-Sector AI and Data Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Brazil Routine

Resolução CCT nº 4/2024 approving the PBIA proposal published in the DOU

Milestone recorded for Plano Brasileiro de Inteligência Artificial 2024-2028 (Brazil): Resolução CCT nº 4/2024 approving the PBIA proposal published in the DOU. Recorded from the official source listed.

Plano Brasileiro de Inteligência Artificial 2024-2028 Resolução CCT nº 4/2024 approving the PBIA proposal published in the DOU Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Australia Routine

Preceding consultation on mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI opened (government later chose not to proceed with them)

Milestone recorded for National AI Plan (Australia): Preceding consultation on mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI opened (government later chose not to proceed with them). Recorded from the official source listed.

National AI Plan Preceding consultation on mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI opened (government later chose not to proceed with them) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Australia High at the time Voluntary standard

Australia releases a Voluntary AI Safety Standard and consults on mandatory guardrails

The Department of Industry, Science and Resources published ten voluntary guardrails and a proposals paper on mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI, with consultation to 4 October 2024.

Practical impact: Australian organisations gained a concrete voluntary baseline aligned with ISO/IEC 42001 and the NIST AI RMF.

Australian Voluntary AI Safety Standard Voluntary AI Safety Standard Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Malaysia Routine

National Guidelines on AI Governance and Ethics issued under the roadmap

Milestone recorded for National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2021-2025 (Malaysia): National Guidelines on AI Governance and Ethics issued under the roadmap. Recorded from the official source listed.

National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2021-2025 National Guidelines on AI Governance and Ethics issued under the roadmap Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Illinois (United States) High at the time Adopted

Illinois makes discriminatory AI in employment a civil-rights violation

Public Act 103-0804 amended the Human Rights Act so that using AI with a discriminatory effect in employment decisions, or zip codes as a proxy, is a violation, with notice duties; effective 1 January 2026.

Practical impact: Illinois employers must test AI hiring and HR tools for discriminatory effect and notify employees before 2026.

Illinois HB 3773 (AI in employment, Human Rights Act amendment) HB 3773 / Public Act 103-0804 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Brazil Routine

PBIA proposal presented at the 5th National CT&I Conference

Milestone recorded for Plano Brasileiro de Inteligência Artificial 2024-2028 (Brazil): PBIA proposal presented at the 5th National CT&I Conference. Recorded from the official source listed.

Plano Brasileiro de Inteligência Artificial 2024-2028 PBIA proposal presented at the 5th National CT&I Conference Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
European Union Urgent at the time Adopted

EU AI Act published in the Official Journal

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 was published in the Official Journal, fixing its entry into force for 1 August 2024 and starting the phased application clock under Article 113.

Practical impact: Every organisation supplying or using AI in the EU can now plan against fixed dates.

EU AI Act Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Nepal Routine

Concept paper published for comments on MoCIT website (21 Asar 2081)

Milestone recorded for Concept Paper on the Use and Practice of Artificial Intelligence in Nepal (Nepal): Concept paper published for comments on MoCIT website (21 Asar 2081). Recorded from the official source listed.

Concept Paper on the Use and Practice of Artificial Intelligence in Nepal Concept paper published for comments on MoCIT website (21 Asar 2081) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Tennessee (United States) Routine In force

Tennessee ELVIS Act takes effect, protecting voice against AI cloning

The Act added voice to the right of publicity and created liability for tools primarily designed to produce unauthorised voice or likeness.

Practical impact: Providers of voice-cloning tools and users of synthetic voices need authorisation for identifiable individuals in Tennessee.

Tennessee ELVIS Act HB 2091 (ELVIS Act) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
African Union Routine

Adopted by African ICT and Communications Ministers (virtual session, 11-13 June 2024)

Milestone recorded for Continental Artificial Intelligence Strategy (African Union): Adopted by African ICT and Communications Ministers (virtual session, 11-13 June 2024). Recorded from the official source listed.

Continental Artificial Intelligence Strategy Adopted by African ICT and Communications Ministers (virtual session, 11-13 June 2024) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Hong Kong SAR Routine Guidance

Hong Kong PCPD publishes the Model Personal Data Protection Framework for AI

The Privacy Commissioner issued recommendations for organisations procuring and deploying AI with personal data, covering governance, risk assessment and human oversight, model customisation and stakeholder communication.

Practical impact: Voluntary, but the PCPD checks against it in compliance reviews; organisations should set up an AI governance committee and risk-based oversight.

PCPD Model Personal Data Protection Framework for AI (2024) Artificial Intelligence: Model Personal Data Protection Framework Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
United Arab Emirates Routine

Charter issued (Cabinet approval) per UAE Legislation portal

Milestone recorded for The UAE Charter for the Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence (United Arab Emirates): Charter issued (Cabinet approval) per UAE Legislation portal. Recorded from the official source listed.

The UAE Charter for the Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence Charter issued (Cabinet approval) per UAE Legislation portal Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Singapore Routine Voluntary standard

Singapore publishes the Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI

IMDA and the AI Verify Foundation released a generative-AI companion to the Model AI Governance Framework with nine governance dimensions including accountability, incident reporting and content provenance.

Practical impact: Generative-AI developers and deployers in Singapore have a reference set of expected practices.

Singapore Model AI Governance Framework Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Council of Europe High at the time Adopted

Council of Europe adopts the first binding international treaty on AI

The Committee of Ministers adopted the Framework Convention on AI and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS 225); it opened for signature on 5 September 2024 with the EU, UK, US and others signing.

Practical impact: Ratifying states must ensure AI activities respect human rights, with risk and impact assessment and remedies; companies feel it through national implementation.

Framework Convention on AI (CETS 225) Framework Convention on AI (CETS No. 225) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Colorado (United States) High at the time Adopted

Colorado signs the first US state law on algorithmic discrimination

Governor Polis signed SB 24-205, creating duties of reasonable care for developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems used in consequential decisions, originally effective 1 February 2026.

Practical impact: Organisations making consequential decisions about Colorado residents should begin scoping risk programmes and impact assessments.

Colorado AI Act SB24-205 Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.

Frequently asked questions

What counts as a change?

A dated development in the life of an instrument: adoption, entry into force, an amendment, a withdrawal, a gazette notice, the opening or closing of a consultation, or guidance being issued under it. Each entry says what changed and what it means in practice, and links the official source.

How far back does the change log go?

To 2017, which is where the earliest recorded national AI strategies sit. Entries are grouped by year, and the whole log is available as an RSS feed and through the API.

Will I be told when something changes?

Follow a jurisdiction or an instrument and you will be alerted when a change is recorded against it. There is also a digest you can subscribe to. Both are free.