Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

Deployers and developers must disclose to consumers that they are interacting with an AI system

Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder Colorado AI Act, C.R.S. 6-1-1704

Pending review · linked to the official source, waiting for a reviewer to confirm it (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
What this label means
Verified
— a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
Pending review
— linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
Source-linked
— linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
Verification policy and current standing · a factual check, not legal advice.
No longer in force: repealed · Signed 17 May 2024; its effective date was moved from 1 February 2026 to 30 June 2026 by SB 25B-004 (August 2025). Before that date arrived, SB 26-189, signed on 14 May 2026, repealed and re-enacted the framework as a narrower automated-decision-making-technology law that applies from 1 January 2027. This act therefore never took effect; see the SB 26-189 record. Recorded on 26 September 2026 from secondary reporting, pending review against the enrolled bill. · official source last checked
On this page 9 sections

In brief

Deployers and developers must disclose to consumers that they are interacting with an AI system is a legal requirement under the Colorado AI Act in Colorado (United States) (C.R.S. 6-1-1704). The record carries 1 evidence example and mappings to 2 frameworks.

Instrument
Colorado AI Act
Nature
Legal requirement
Source reference
C.R.S. 6-1-1704
Who it binds
Provider / developer, Deployer / user organisation
Evidence examples
1
Framework mappings
NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0, ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Controls that meet it
1
Official source
Open official text
Verification
Pending review · source-linked

What does it require?

Any developer or deployer that makes an AI system available to consumers that is intended to interact with them must disclose to each consumer that they are interacting with an AI system, unless that would be obvious to a reasonable person. This duty is not limited to high-risk systems and covers chatbots and voice agents offered to Colorado consumers.

Practical action

Add an AI disclosure at the start of chatbot, voice and messaging interactions and record where it appears.

Who does it apply to?

Developers and deployers of any consumer-facing AI system intended to interact with consumers, whatever its risk level.

Which controls meet this duty?

Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.

  • satisfiesProcessProduct owner · at launch and on material change
    AI interaction and use disclosure notices

    Serves 18 recorded duties · evidence: AI interaction or use notice, Notice catalogue, Notice wording approval

    Point-of-interaction notice.

Templates that cover this duty

Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.

All 9 templates that cover it →

What evidence would a reviewer expect?

Evidence examples
EvidenceTypeNotes
AI interaction disclosure copy and screenshotsdocument

Framework mappings

Original editorial crosswalks. They cite clause numbers only and reproduce no standard text; confidence reflects how direct the mapping is.

See every Colorado (United States) duty mapped this way →

Framework mappings table
FrameworkReferenceNoteConfidence
NIST AI RMF 1.0GOVERN 5.1, MANAGE 4.1Transparency to end users.medium
ISO/IEC 42001:2023Annex A.8.5Information for interested parties.medium

Frequently asked questions

Is this a legal requirement?

Yes. It is a legal requirement under Colorado AI Act (C.R.S. 6-1-1704).

Who must comply with this obligation?

Developers and deployers of any consumer-facing AI system intended to interact with consumers, whatever its risk level.

What evidence shows compliance?

A reviewer would expect: AI interaction disclosure copy and screenshots.

Which frameworks map to this obligation?

It is mapped to NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 GOVERN 5.1, MANAGE 4.1, ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A.8.5. These are editorial crosswalks with a stated confidence, not official mappings.

Which controls satisfy this obligation?

AI interaction and use disclosure notices.

What should an organisation do in practice?

Add an AI disclosure at the start of chatbot, voice and messaging interactions and record where it appears.

Cite this record

AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Deployers and developers must disclose to consumers that they are interacting with an AI system (Colorado AI Act)” [AIPT-OBL-0093, not yet verified]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0093 (accessed 8 November 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.

Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0093: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.

Cite the official text alongside it: SB24-205 Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence, Colorado General Assembly, https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb24-205.

BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_deployersanddevelopersmu,
  author       = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
  title        = {{Deployers and developers must disclose to consumers that they are interacting with an AI system (Colorado AI Act)}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-ai-act-consumer-ai-interaction-disclosure}},
  url          = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-ai-act-consumer-ai-interaction-disclosure},
  urldate      = {2026-11-08},
  note         = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 8 November 2026}
}

Change history

No change to this record's tracked fields has been recorded since 15 October 2026, when field-level history began.

Similar obligations in other instruments

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.