Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

AI policy change log

Dated, source-backed updates: what changed, the practical impact, the status after the change and the official source. Urgent and high-impact items are separated from routine updates.

Filter changes
Reset

Weekly digest

Dated, source-linked AI policy changes and upcoming application dates, once a week. No marketing.

Double opt-in; one-click unsubscribe in every email. Choose jurisdictions

All changes (452)

Download as CSV
Spain High at the time Proposed

Spain approves a draft law implementing the EU AI Act with mandatory AI-content labelling

The Council of Ministers approved the preliminary draft law on the good use and governance of AI, allocating supervision to AESIA and sector authorities, setting national penalties and treating unlabelled AI-generated content as a serious infringement.

Practical impact: Companies operating in Spain should prepare labelling of synthetic content and expect AESIA as the main supervisor.

Draft law on good use and governance of AI AESIA Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Switzerland Routine Adopted

Swiss Federal Council chooses sector rules and the Council of Europe convention over an AI act

The Federal Council decided to ratify the Council of Europe Framework Convention and implement it through targeted sector-specific changes plus self-regulation, with a consultation draft due by the end of 2026.

Practical impact: Swiss organisations will not face a horizontal AI law; transparency, data-protection and non-discrimination amendments are the ones to watch.

Federal Council AI regulatory approach (2025) Federal Council wants to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on AI Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
United Kingdom Routine

AI Playbook published, superseding the Generative AI Framework for HMG

Milestone recorded for Artificial Intelligence Playbook for the UK Government (United Kingdom): AI Playbook published, superseding the Generative AI Framework for HMG. Recorded from the official source listed.

Artificial Intelligence Playbook for the UK Government AI Playbook published, superseding the Generative AI Framework for HMG Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
European Union Urgent at the time Partially applicable

EU AI Act prohibited practices and AI-literacy duties start to apply

Chapters I and II of the AI Act became applicable, banning the Article 5 practices and requiring providers and deployers to ensure AI literacy under Article 4. The Commission published guidelines on prohibited practices on 4 February 2025.

Practical impact: Prohibited-use screening and staff AI training are now legal requirements for anyone using AI in the EU.

EU AI Act Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 113(a) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
United States High at the time In force

US Executive Order 14179 sets a new federal AI policy after EO 14110 was revoked

Three days after Executive Order 14148 revoked the 2023 "Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy AI" order, EO 14179 directed an AI Action Plan within 180 days and a review of prior agency actions.

Practical impact: Federal AI requirements derived from EO 14110 were placed under review; vendors should check what agencies still require.

EO 14179 Executive Order 14179 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
South Korea Routine

Promulgated as Act No. 20676

Milestone recorded for Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of a Foundation for Trust (South Korea): Promulgated as Act No. 20676. Recorded from the official source listed.

AI Basic Act Promulgated as Act No. 20676 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Ontario (Canada) Routine Adopted

Ontario enacts a framework for regulating public-sector AI use

Bill 194 received royal assent, enabling regulations on disclosure, accountability frameworks, risk management and prohibited uses of AI by Ontario public-sector entities.

Practical impact: Public bodies in Ontario should inventory AI systems ahead of regulations; vendors to government should expect disclosure requirements.

Ontario Enhancing Digital Security and Trust Act, 2024 (Bill 194) Bill 194 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Uruguay Routine

Strategy approved by the Strategic Committee for Public-Sector AI and Data

Milestone recorded for Estrategia Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial del Uruguay 2024-2030 (Uruguay): Strategy approved by the Strategic Committee for Public-Sector AI and Data. Recorded from the official source listed.

Estrategia Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial del Uruguay 2024-2030 Strategy approved by the Strategic Committee for Public-Sector AI and Data Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Brazil Routine

Resolução CCT nº 4/2024 approving the PBIA proposal published in the DOU

Milestone recorded for Plano Brasileiro de Inteligência Artificial 2024-2028 (Brazil): Resolução CCT nº 4/2024 approving the PBIA proposal published in the DOU. Recorded from the official source listed.

Plano Brasileiro de Inteligência Artificial 2024-2028 Resolução CCT nº 4/2024 approving the PBIA proposal published in the DOU Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Australia Routine

Preceding consultation on mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI opened (government later chose not to proceed with them)

Milestone recorded for National AI Plan (Australia): Preceding consultation on mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI opened (government later chose not to proceed with them). Recorded from the official source listed.

National AI Plan Preceding consultation on mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI opened (government later chose not to proceed with them) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Australia High at the time Voluntary standard

Australia releases a Voluntary AI Safety Standard and consults on mandatory guardrails

The Department of Industry, Science and Resources published ten voluntary guardrails and a proposals paper on mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI, with consultation to 4 October 2024.

Practical impact: Australian organisations gained a concrete voluntary baseline aligned with ISO/IEC 42001 and the NIST AI RMF.

Australian Voluntary AI Safety Standard Voluntary AI Safety Standard Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Malaysia Routine

National Guidelines on AI Governance and Ethics issued under the roadmap

Milestone recorded for National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2021-2025 (Malaysia): National Guidelines on AI Governance and Ethics issued under the roadmap. Recorded from the official source listed.

National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2021-2025 National Guidelines on AI Governance and Ethics issued under the roadmap Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Illinois (United States) High at the time Adopted

Illinois makes discriminatory AI in employment a civil-rights violation

Public Act 103-0804 amended the Human Rights Act so that using AI with a discriminatory effect in employment decisions, or zip codes as a proxy, is a violation, with notice duties; effective 1 January 2026.

Practical impact: Illinois employers must test AI hiring and HR tools for discriminatory effect and notify employees before 2026.

Illinois HB 3773 (AI in employment, Human Rights Act amendment) HB 3773 / Public Act 103-0804 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.

Frequently asked questions

What counts as a change?

A dated development in the life of an instrument: adoption, entry into force, an amendment, a withdrawal, a gazette notice, the opening or closing of a consultation, or guidance being issued under it. Each entry says what changed and what it means in practice, and links the official source.

How far back does the change log go?

To 2017, which is where the earliest recorded national AI strategies sit. Entries are grouped by year, and the whole log is available as an RSS feed and through the API.

Will I be told when something changes?

Follow a jurisdiction or an instrument and you will be alerted when a change is recorded against it. There is also a digest you can subscribe to. Both are free.