Design high-risk systems to log events automatically
Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder EU AI Act, Article 12; Article 26(6) for deployers
What this label means
- Verified
- — a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
- Pending review
- — linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
- Source-linked
- — linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
On this page 9 sections
In brief
Design high-risk systems to log events automatically is a legal requirement under the EU AI Act in the European Union (Article 12; Article 26(6) for deployers). High-risk AI systems must technically allow automatic recording of events (logs) over their lifetime to support traceability, post-market monitoring and operational monitoring. It applies from 2 December 2027.
- Instrument
- EU AI Act
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Nature
- Legal requirement
- Source reference
- Article 12; Article 26(6) for deployers
- Applies from
- 2 December 2027
- Who it binds
- Provider / developer, Deployer / user organisation
- Evidence examples
- 1
- Framework mappings
- ISO/IEC 42001:2023, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0
- Controls that meet it
- 1
- Official source
- Open official text
- Verification
- Pending review · source-linked
What does it require?
High-risk AI systems must technically allow automatic recording of events (logs) over their lifetime to support traceability, post-market monitoring and operational monitoring. Deployers must keep the logs generated by the system, to the extent under their control, for a period appropriate to the intended purpose and at least six months unless other law provides otherwise.
Practical action
Define the log schema, retention and access controls, and confirm deployer retention meets the minimum.
Who does it apply to?
Providers (design) and deployers (retention) of high-risk AI systems.
- Sectors
- Cross-sector / all sectors
Applies from:
Which controls meet this duty?
Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.
-
satisfiesTechnical measureEngineering lead · continuousAutomatic event logging and record retention
Serves 9 recorded duties · evidence: AI system event logs, Log schema and retention standard, Log integrity and retention check
Automatic logging with a defined schema, retention and access controls.
Templates that cover this duty
Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.
- AI System Inventory
Register · XLSX and DOCX · v6
- EU AI Act Role and Risk Classifier
Checklist · XLSX · v4
- AI Agent Registry and Permission Matrix
Register · XLSX and DOCX · v6
- EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Kit
Kit · DOCX and XLSX · v32
What evidence would a reviewer expect?
| Evidence | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Logging specification and retention policy | document |
Framework mappings
Original editorial crosswalks. They cite clause numbers only and reproduce no standard text; confidence reflects how direct the mapping is.
See every European Union duty mapped this way →
| Framework | Reference | Note | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | Annex A control on event logging | Original editorial mapping. | medium |
| NIST AI RMF 1.0 | MEASURE 2.x, MANAGE 4.1 | Monitoring and traceability. | medium |
Frequently asked questions
Is this a legal requirement?
Yes. It is a legal requirement under EU AI Act (Article 12; Article 26(6) for deployers).
Who must comply with this obligation?
Providers (design) and deployers (retention) of high-risk AI systems.
When does this obligation apply?
It applies from 2 December 2027.
What evidence shows compliance?
A reviewer would expect: Logging specification and retention policy.
Which frameworks map to this obligation?
It is mapped to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A control on event logging, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 MEASURE 2.x, MANAGE 4.1. These are editorial crosswalks with a stated confidence, not official mappings.
Which controls satisfy this obligation?
Automatic event logging and record retention.
What should an organisation do in practice?
Define the log schema, retention and access controls, and confirm deployer retention meets the minimum.
Cite this record
AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Design high-risk systems to log events automatically (EU AI Act)” [AIPT-OBL-0009, not yet verified]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0009 (accessed 27 October 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.
Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0009: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.
Cite the official text alongside it: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, Official Journal of the European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj.
BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_designhighrisksystemstol,
author = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
title = {{Design high-risk systems to log events automatically (EU AI Act)}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-record-keeping}},
url = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-record-keeping},
urldate = {2026-10-27},
note = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 27 October 2026}
}
Change history
No change to this record's tracked fields has been recorded since 15 October 2026, when field-level history began.
Similar obligations in other instruments
- Providers must keep high-risk AI documentation for ten years — EU AI Act, European Union
- Providers must retain automatically generated logs under their control — EU AI Act, European Union
- Keep records of consequential decisions influenced by the technology for three years — Colorado ADMT law (SB 26-189), Colorado (United States)
Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.