Provide deployers with clear instructions for use
Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder EU AI Act, Article 13
What this label means
- Verified
- — a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
- Pending review
- — linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
- Source-linked
- — linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
On this page 9 sections
In brief
Provide deployers with clear instructions for use is a legal requirement under the EU AI Act in the European Union (Article 13). It applies from 2 December 2027. The record carries 1 evidence example and mappings to 2 frameworks. In practice: Ship an Article 13-structured instructions-for-use document with every high-risk system release.
- Instrument
- EU AI Act
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Nature
- Legal requirement
- Source reference
- Article 13
- Applies from
- 2 December 2027
- Who it binds
- Provider / developer
- Evidence examples
- 1
- Framework mappings
- ISO/IEC 42001:2023, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0
- Controls that meet it
- 2
- Official source
- Open official text
- Verification
- Pending review · source-linked
What does it require?
High-risk AI systems must be designed so their operation is sufficiently transparent for deployers to interpret output and use it appropriately, and must be accompanied by instructions for use covering the provider's identity, the system's characteristics, capabilities and limitations, performance for the intended purpose and known foreseeable misuse, human-oversight measures, expected lifetime and maintenance.
Practical action
Ship an Article 13-structured instructions-for-use document with every high-risk system release.
Who does it apply to?
Providers of high-risk AI systems.
- Actors
- Provider / developer
- Sectors
- Cross-sector / all sectors
Applies from:
Which controls meet this duty?
Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.
-
satisfiesProcessProduct or model owner · at launch and on material changeTechnical documentation, model cards and instructions for use
Serves 14 recorded duties · evidence: Technical documentation file, Model card or deployer information pack, Instructions for use
Instructions for use derived from the technical documentation.
-
supportsContractual termLegal counsel · once per ai systemContractual allocation of AI duties across the supply chain
Serves 9 recorded duties · evidence: AI supplier clause set, AI customer or deployer clause set, Contract clause index against the AI register
Customer terms carry the instructions and feedback channels.
Templates that cover this duty
Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.
- EU AI Act Role and Risk Classifier
Checklist · XLSX · v4
- AI Agent Registry and Permission Matrix
Register · XLSX and DOCX · v6
- EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Kit
Kit · DOCX and XLSX · v32
- ISO/IEC 42001 Gap Assessment and Statement of Applicability
Assessment · XLSX · v3
What evidence would a reviewer expect?
| Evidence | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Instructions for use | document |
Framework mappings
Original editorial crosswalks. They cite clause numbers only and reproduce no standard text; confidence reflects how direct the mapping is.
See every European Union duty mapped this way →
| Framework | Reference | Note | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | Annex A controls on information for interested parties | Original editorial mapping. | medium |
| NIST AI RMF 1.0 | GOVERN 4.x, MAP 1.x | Transparency to downstream users. | medium |
Frequently asked questions
Is this a legal requirement?
Yes. It is a legal requirement under EU AI Act (Article 13).
Who must comply with this obligation?
Providers of high-risk AI systems.
When does this obligation apply?
It applies from 2 December 2027.
What evidence shows compliance?
A reviewer would expect: Instructions for use.
Which frameworks map to this obligation?
It is mapped to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A controls on information for interested parties, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 GOVERN 4.x, MAP 1.x. These are editorial crosswalks with a stated confidence, not official mappings.
Which controls satisfy this obligation?
Technical documentation, model cards and instructions for use; Contractual allocation of AI duties across the supply chain.
What should an organisation do in practice?
Ship an Article 13-structured instructions-for-use document with every high-risk system release.
Cite this record
AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Provide deployers with clear instructions for use (EU AI Act)” [AIPT-OBL-0010, not yet verified]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0010 (accessed 27 October 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.
Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0010: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.
Cite the official text alongside it: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, Official Journal of the European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj.
BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_providedeployerswithclea,
author = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
title = {{Provide deployers with clear instructions for use (EU AI Act)}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-transparency-to-deployers}},
url = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-transparency-to-deployers},
urldate = {2026-10-27},
note = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 27 October 2026}
}
Change history
No change to this record's tracked fields has been recorded since 15 October 2026, when field-level history began.
Similar obligations in other instruments
- Employers must inform workers and their representatives before using high-risk AI at work — EU AI Act, European Union
- Disclose AI interaction and label synthetic content — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers must tell natural persons that a high-risk AI system is used in decisions about them — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers of emotion recognition or biometric categorisation must inform exposed persons — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers must disclose deepfakes and AI-generated text published on matters of public interest — EU AI Act, European Union
- Providers of generative AI must mark synthetic output as artificially generated in a machine-readable way — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers must explain individual decisions taken with high-risk AI on request — EU AI Act, European Union
- Frontier developers must publish a transparency report before deploying a new frontier model — California SB 53, California (United States)
Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.