Carry out a fundamental rights impact assessment before deployment
Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder EU AI Act, Article 27
What this label means
- Verified
- — a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
- Pending review
- — linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
- Source-linked
- — linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
On this page 9 sections
In brief
Carry out a fundamental rights impact assessment before deployment is a legal requirement under the EU AI Act in the European Union (Article 27). It applies from 2 December 2027. The record carries 1 evidence example and mappings to 2 frameworks.
- Instrument
- EU AI Act
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Nature
- Legal requirement
- Source reference
- Article 27
- Applies from
- 2 December 2027
- Who it binds
- Deployer / user organisation, Public authority / government body
- Evidence examples
- 1
- Framework mappings
- ISO/IEC 42001:2023, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0
- Controls that meet it
- 2
- Official source
- Open official text
- Verification
- Pending review · source-linked
What does it require?
Before deploying most Annex III high-risk systems, deployers that are bodies governed by public law or private entities providing public services, and deployers using systems for creditworthiness assessment or life and health insurance pricing, must assess the impact on fundamental rights: the processes, period and frequency of use, categories of affected persons, specific risks of harm, human-oversight measures and mitigation, and notify the market-surveillance authority of the results.
Practical action
Reuse GDPR DPIA workflows and extend them with the Article 27 elements; the AI Office is to provide a template.
Who does it apply to?
Public bodies, private providers of public services, and deployers in credit and insurance use cases.
Applies from:
Which controls meet this duty?
Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.
-
satisfiesProcessAI system owner · once per ai systemAI impact and fundamental-rights impact assessment
Serves 11 recorded duties · evidence: AI impact assessment, Impact assessment approval, Impact assessment procedure and template
A rights-focused assessment template covering the required elements.
-
supportsProcessData protection officer · once per ai systemPrivacy and data-protection controls for AI
Serves 13 recorded duties · evidence: Data protection impact assessment for an AI system, AI data-flow and legal-basis record, Privacy notice section on AI use
Reuse of the DPIA workflow and findings.
Templates that cover this duty
Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.
- EU AI Act Role and Risk Classifier
Checklist · XLSX · v4
- Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA)
Assessment · DOCX and XLSX · v5
- AI Impact Assessment
Assessment · DOCX and XLSX · v5
- EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Kit
Kit · DOCX and XLSX · v32
What evidence would a reviewer expect?
| Evidence | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fundamental rights impact assessment report | report |
Framework mappings
Original editorial crosswalks. They cite clause numbers only and reproduce no standard text; confidence reflects how direct the mapping is.
See every European Union duty mapped this way →
| Framework | Reference | Note | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | Clause 6.1.4 AI system impact assessment; Annex A control on impact assessment | Original editorial mapping. | high |
| NIST AI RMF 1.0 | MAP 5.1, MAP 5.2 | Impacts on individuals, groups and society. | medium |
Frequently asked questions
Is this a legal requirement?
Yes. It is a legal requirement under EU AI Act (Article 27).
Who must comply with this obligation?
Public bodies, private providers of public services, and deployers in credit and insurance use cases.
When does this obligation apply?
It applies from 2 December 2027.
What evidence shows compliance?
A reviewer would expect: Fundamental rights impact assessment report.
Which frameworks map to this obligation?
It is mapped to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 6.1.4 AI system impact assessment; Annex A control on impact assessment, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 MAP 5.1, MAP 5.2. These are editorial crosswalks with a stated confidence, not official mappings.
Which controls satisfy this obligation?
AI impact and fundamental-rights impact assessment; Privacy and data-protection controls for AI.
What should an organisation do in practice?
Reuse GDPR DPIA workflows and extend them with the Article 27 elements; the AI Office is to provide a template.
Cite this record
AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Carry out a fundamental rights impact assessment before deployment (EU AI Act)” [AIPT-OBL-0016, not yet verified]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0016 (accessed 27 October 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.
Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0016: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.
Cite the official text alongside it: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, Official Journal of the European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj.
BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_carryoutafundamentalrigh,
author = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
title = {{Carry out a fundamental rights impact assessment before deployment (EU AI Act)}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-fundamental-rights-impact-assessment}},
url = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-fundamental-rights-impact-assessment},
urldate = {2026-10-27},
note = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 27 October 2026}
}
Change history
No change to this record's tracked fields has been recorded since 15 October 2026, when field-level history began.
Similar obligations in other instruments
- Significant Data Fiduciaries must appoint a DPO and run impact assessments and audits — India DPDP Act, India
- Carry out a data protection impact assessment for high-risk AI processing — ICO AI guidance, United Kingdom
- Conduct a data protection impact assessment for high-risk processing using new technologies — UAE PDPL, United Arab Emirates
- Deployers must complete impact assessments for high-risk AI — Colorado AI Act, Colorado (United States)
- Map context, intended use and potential impacts (Map) — NIST AI RMF, United States (voluntary)
- Operators of high-impact AI should assess its impact on fundamental rights before use — AI Basic Act, South Korea (voluntary)
Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.