Providers of high-risk AI must have written agreements with suppliers of components, tools and services
Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder EU AI Act, Article 25(4)
What this label means
- Verified
- — a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
- Pending review
- — linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
- Source-linked
- — linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
On this page 9 sections
In brief
Providers of high-risk AI must have written agreements with suppliers of components, tools and services is a legal requirement under the EU AI Act in the European Union (Article 25(4)). It applies from 2 December 2027. The record carries 2 evidence examples and mappings to 2 frameworks.
- Instrument
- EU AI Act
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Nature
- Legal requirement
- Source reference
- Article 25(4)
- Applies from
- 2 December 2027
- Who it binds
- Provider / developer
- Evidence examples
- 2
- Framework mappings
- ISO/IEC 42001:2023, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0
- Controls that meet it
- 2
- Official source
- Open official text
- Verification
- Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026
What does it require?
A provider of a high-risk AI system and any third party that supplies AI systems, tools, services, components or processes used in or integrated into it must set out, in a written agreement, the information, capabilities, technical access and other assistance needed for the provider to meet its obligations, based on the generally acknowledged state of the art. Suppliers of free and open-source tools and components other than general-purpose AI models are outside this duty. The AI Office may publish voluntary model terms.
Practical action
Insert AI Act information, access and assistance clauses into contracts with model, data and component suppliers.
Who does it apply to?
Providers of high-risk AI systems and their third-party suppliers of components, models, tools, services or processes.
- Actors
- Provider / developer
- Sectors
- Cross-sector / all sectors
Applies from:
Which controls meet this duty?
Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.
-
satisfiesContractual termLegal counsel · once per ai systemContractual allocation of AI duties across the supply chain
Serves 9 recorded duties · evidence: AI supplier clause set, AI customer or deployer clause set, Contract clause index against the AI register
The written agreement itself.
-
supportsProcessProcurement or vendor risk lead · once per ai systemVendor and third-party AI due diligence
Serves 6 recorded duties · evidence: AI supplier due-diligence assessment, AI supplier and component register, Supplier onboarding decision
Identifies which suppliers fall within Article 25(4).
Templates that cover this duty
Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.
- EU AI Act Role and Risk Classifier
Checklist · XLSX · v4
- AI Vendor Due-Diligence Questionnaire
Checklist · XLSX and DOCX · v3
- EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Kit
Kit · DOCX and XLSX · v44
- ISO/IEC 42001 Gap Assessment and Statement of Applicability
Assessment · XLSX · v3
What evidence would a reviewer expect?
| Evidence | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier agreement with AI Act information and access clauses | document | |
| Supplier register with agreement status | register |
Framework mappings
Original editorial crosswalks. They cite clause numbers only and reproduce no standard text; confidence reflects how direct the mapping is.
See every European Union duty mapped this way →
| Framework | Reference | Note | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | Annex A.10.3 | Supplier relationships aligned with the organisation's AI responsibilities. | high |
| NIST AI RMF 1.0 | GOVERN 6.1 | Policies for third-party AI risks. | high |
Frequently asked questions
Is this a legal requirement?
Yes. It is a legal requirement under EU AI Act (Article 25(4)).
Who must comply with this obligation?
Providers of high-risk AI systems and their third-party suppliers of components, models, tools, services or processes.
When does this obligation apply?
It applies from 2 December 2027.
What evidence shows compliance?
A reviewer would expect: Supplier agreement with AI Act information and access clauses; Supplier register with agreement status.
Which frameworks map to this obligation?
It is mapped to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A.10.3, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 GOVERN 6.1. These are editorial crosswalks with a stated confidence, not official mappings.
Which controls satisfy this obligation?
Contractual allocation of AI duties across the supply chain; Vendor and third-party AI due diligence.
What should an organisation do in practice?
Insert AI Act information, access and assistance clauses into contracts with model, data and component suppliers.
Cite this record
AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Providers of high-risk AI must have written agreements with suppliers of components, tools and services (EU AI Act)” [AIPT-OBL-0030, verified 26 September 2026]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0030 (accessed 8 November 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.
Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0030: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.
Cite the official text alongside it: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, Official Journal of the European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj.
BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_providersofhighriskaimus,
author = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
title = {{Providers of high-risk AI must have written agreements with suppliers of components, tools and services (EU AI Act)}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-25-4-written-agreements-with-component-suppliers}},
url = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-25-4-written-agreements-with-component-suppliers},
urldate = {2026-11-08},
note = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 8 November 2026}
}
Change history
No change to this record's tracked fields has been recorded since 15 October 2026, when field-level history began.
Similar obligations in other instruments
- Verify conformity before importing or distributing high-risk AI — EU AI Act, European Union
- Provide contestability, supply-chain transparency and records (guardrails 7 to 9) — Australian Voluntary AI Safety Standard, Australia (voluntary)
Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.