AIPolicyTracker
Legal requirement Transparency and disclosure South Korea In force

AI business operators must label generative AI output and clearly flag realistic synthetic media

Context fileUnder Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of a Foundation for Trust, Article 31(2) and 31(3)

Source-linked Open official source

What does it require?

An AI business operator that provides generative AI or a product or service using it must indicate that the output was generated by generative AI. Where the operator provides content such as virtual sound, images or video that is hard to distinguish from reality, it must clearly notify users that the content is AI-generated, in a manner that does not impair a work's artistic or creative expression where that applies. Detailed methods are left to Presidential Decree and ministry guidance.

Practical action

Apply visible labels and, where feasible, embedded provenance marks to generated audio, image and video, and track the decree's technical specifications.

Who does it apply to?

Providers of generative AI and of products or services built on it that deliver output to users in Korea.

Applies from:

Which controls meet this duty?

Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.

  • satisfiesTechnical measureEngineering lead · continuous
    Synthetic content labelling and provenance marking

    Serves 5 recorded duties · evidence: Content labelling and provenance standard, Watermark and provenance robustness test, Visible AI-generated content label

    Labels and provenance marks on generated output and realistic synthetic media.

What evidence would a reviewer expect?

Evidence examples
EvidenceTypeNotes
Output labelling design and samplesrecord
Synthetic media labelling standarddocument

Framework mappings

Original editorial crosswalks. They cite clause numbers only and reproduce no standard text; confidence reflects how direct the mapping is.

See every South Korea duty mapped this way →

Framework mappings
FrameworkReferenceNoteConfidence
NIST AI RMF 1.0MEASURE 2.7, MANAGE 4.1Content provenance as described in NIST AI 600-1.medium
ISO/IEC 42001:2023Annex A.8.2, A.8.5System documentation and information for interested parties.low

Cite this record

AIPolicyTracker (2026). “AI business operators must label generative AI output and clearly flag realistic synthetic media (Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of a Foundation for Trust)”. https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-31-generative-output-labelling-and-deepfake-notice (accessed 24 September 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.

Cite the official text alongside it: Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of a Foundation for Trust (AI Basic Act, Act No. 20676), Korea Ministry of Government Legislation, National Law Information Center, https://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=268543.

Similar obligations in other instruments

Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.