Tell users at the start of an AI companion interaction, and at least every three hours, that they are not communicating with a human
Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder New York AI companion safeguards, N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 1702
What this label means
- Verified
- — a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
- Pending review
- — linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
- Source-linked
- — linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
On this page 8 sections
In brief
Tell users at the start of an AI companion interaction, and at least every three hours, that they are not communicating with a human is a legal requirement under the New York AI companion safeguards in New York (United States) (N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 1702). The record carries 1 evidence example.
- Instrument
- New York AI companion safeguards
- Jurisdiction
- New York (United States)
- Nature
- Legal requirement
- Source reference
- N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 1702
- Who it binds
- Provider / developer, Deployer / user organisation
- Evidence examples
- 1
- Controls that meet it
- 1
- Official source
- Open official text
- Verification
- Pending review · source-linked
What does it require?
An operator must give the user a clear and conspicuous notification, spoken or written, that the user is not communicating with a human. It is given at the beginning of any AI companion interaction, which the text says need not happen more than once a day, and at least every three hours during a continuing interaction. The Attorney General may seek an injunction and civil penalties of up to 15,000 dollars per day for a violation (section 1703).
Practical action
Show a prominent not-human notice when an interaction starts (at least once a day) and repeat it on a timer of three hours or less while the conversation continues, in voice as well as text products.
Who does it apply to?
- Sectors
- Consumer products and retail
- Use cases
- Customer service and chatbots
Which controls meet this duty?
Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.
-
satisfiesProcessProduct owner · at launch and on material changeAI interaction and use disclosure notices
Serves 23 recorded duties · evidence: AI interaction or use notice, Notice catalogue, Notice wording approval
The start-of-interaction and three-hourly notice that the user is not talking to a human.
Templates that cover this duty
Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.
- AI Agent Registry and Permission Matrix
Register · XLSX and DOCX · v7
- EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Kit
Kit · DOCX and XLSX · v47
- AI Companion Chatbot Safety Kit
Kit · DOCX and XLSX · v1
- AI Model Card
Kit · DOCX and XLSX · v5
What evidence would a reviewer expect?
| Evidence | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Screenshots or recordings of the opening notice and the repeated notice, with the timer setting | document |
Frequently asked questions
Is this a legal requirement?
Yes. It is a legal requirement under New York AI companion safeguards (N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 1702).
What evidence shows compliance?
A reviewer would expect: Screenshots or recordings of the opening notice and the repeated notice, with the timer setting.
Which controls satisfy this obligation?
AI interaction and use disclosure notices.
What should an organisation do in practice?
Show a prominent not-human notice when an interaction starts (at least once a day) and repeat it on a timer of three hours or less while the conversation continues, in voice as well as text products.
Cite this record
AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Tell users at the start of an AI companion interaction, and at least every three hours, that they are not communicating with a human (New York AI companion safeguards)” [AIPT-OBL-0129, not yet verified]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0129 (accessed 12 November 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.
Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0129: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.
Cite the official text alongside it: New York General Business Law section 1701, New York State Senate, https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/1702.
BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_tellusersatthestartofana,
author = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
title = {{Tell users at the start of an AI companion interaction, and at least every three hours, that they are not communicating with a human (New York AI companion safeguards)}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-new-york-gbl-1702-ai-notification}},
url = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-new-york-gbl-1702-ai-notification},
urldate = {2026-11-12},
note = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 12 November 2026}
}
Change history
No change to this record's tracked fields has been recorded since 15 October 2026, when field-level history began.
Similar obligations in other instruments
- Give consumers a Pre-use Notice before using automated decision-making technology for a significant decision — California CPPA automated decision-making rules, California (United States)
- Answer consumers' requests to access information about how automated decision-making technology was used about them — California CPPA automated decision-making rules, California (United States)
- Tell users that an AI companion chatbot is artificially generated and not human, at the start and at least every three hours — Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225), Washington State (United States)
- Where the user is known to be a minor or the chatbot is directed to minors, repeat the not-human notice at least every hour — Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225), Washington State (United States)
- Publish the self-harm protocol and the number of crisis referral notifications issued in the preceding calendar year — Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225), Washington State (United States)
- Disclose AI interaction and label synthetic content — EU AI Act, European Union
- Employers must inform workers and their representatives before using high-risk AI at work — EU AI Act, European Union
- Providers of generative AI must mark synthetic output as artificially generated in a machine-readable way — EU AI Act, European Union
Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.