Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

Publish the self-harm protocol and the number of crisis referral notifications issued in the preceding calendar year

Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225), ESHB 2225 (Chapter 168, Laws of 2026), sec. 5(3)

Pending review · linked to the official source, waiting for a reviewer to confirm it (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
What this label means
Verified
— a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
Pending review
— linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
Source-linked
— linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
Verification policy and current standing · a factual check, not legal advice.
Record updated on 12 Nov 2026 · Summary · official source last checked
On this page 8 sections

In brief

Publish the self-harm protocol and the number of crisis referral notifications issued in the preceding calendar year is a legal requirement under the Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225) in Washington State (United States) (ESHB 2225 (Chapter 168, Laws of 2026), sec. 5(3)). It applies from 1 January 2027. The record carries 2 evidence examples.

Nature
Legal requirement
Source reference
ESHB 2225 (Chapter 168, Laws of 2026), sec. 5(3)
Applies from
1 January 2027
Who it binds
Provider / developer, Deployer / user organisation
Evidence examples
2
Controls that meet it
2
Official source
Open official text
Verification
Pending review · source-linked

What does it require?

The operator must publicly disclose the details of its section 5 protocols on its website or websites and within any mobile or web application through which the AI companion is offered. The disclosure covers the safeguards used to detect and respond to expressions of suicidal ideation or self-harm, and the number of crisis referral notifications issued to users in the preceding calendar year. The act does not set a date by which the disclosure must be updated.

Practical action

Publish a protocol page on the website and inside the app, count every crisis referral notification issued, and add the previous calendar year's total to the page.

Who does it apply to?

Applies from:

Which controls meet this duty?

Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.

  • supportsProcessProduct owner · at launch and on material change
    AI interaction and use disclosure notices

    Serves 23 recorded duties · evidence: AI interaction or use notice, Notice catalogue, Notice wording approval

    Public notice about how the chatbot handles self-harm and suicide.

  • supportsTechnical measureEngineering lead · continuous
    Automatic event logging and record retention

    Serves 11 recorded duties · evidence: AI system event logs, Log schema and retention standard, Log integrity and retention check

    Logging each crisis referral notification so the yearly number can be published.

Templates that cover this duty

Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.

All 7 templates that cover it →

What evidence would a reviewer expect?

Evidence examples
EvidenceTypeNotes
The published protocol page on the website and in the app, with the date it went livedocument
The log or report from which the yearly count of crisis referral notifications is takendocument

Frequently asked questions

Is this a legal requirement?

Yes. It is a legal requirement under Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225) (ESHB 2225 (Chapter 168, Laws of 2026), sec. 5(3)).

When does this obligation apply?

It applies from 1 January 2027.

What evidence shows compliance?

A reviewer would expect: The published protocol page on the website and in the app, with the date it went live; The log or report from which the yearly count of crisis referral notifications is taken.

Which controls satisfy this obligation?

AI interaction and use disclosure notices; Automatic event logging and record retention.

What should an organisation do in practice?

Publish a protocol page on the website and inside the app, count every crisis referral notification issued, and add the previous calendar year's total to the page.

Cite this record

AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Publish the self-harm protocol and the number of crisis referral notifications issued in the preceding calendar year (Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225))” [AIPT-OBL-0127, not yet verified]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0127 (accessed 12 November 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.

Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0127: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.

Cite the official text alongside it: Washington State Legislature: HB 2225 (2025-26) bill summary, Washington State Legislature, https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2025-26/Pdf/Bills/Session%20Laws/House/2225-S.SL.pdf.

BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_publishtheselfharmprotoc,
  author       = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
  title        = {{Publish the self-harm protocol and the number of crisis referral notifications issued in the preceding calendar year (Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225))}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-washington-eshb-2225-protocol-publication}},
  url          = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-washington-eshb-2225-protocol-publication},
  urldate      = {2026-11-12},
  note         = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 12 November 2026}
}

Change history

No change to this record's tracked fields has been recorded since 15 October 2026, when field-level history began.

Similar obligations in other instruments

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.