Give consumers a Pre-use Notice before using automated decision-making technology for a significant decision

Practical action

For each system that makes or replaces a human's significant decision, write a Pre-use Notice naming the specific decision, the opt-out (or appeal) route, the access right, and how the system and its alternative process work; show it before collection in the channel the consumer uses.

Who does it apply to?

Actors

Deployer / user organisation

Sectors

Employment and HRFinancial services and creditHealthcare and life sciencesEducation and training

Use cases

AI in hiring and employmentAI in healthcareAI in finance, credit and insuranceAI in education

Applies from: 1 January 2027

Which controls meet this duty?

Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.

• satisfiesProcessProduct owner · at launch and on material change
  AI interaction and use disclosure notices

  Serves 23 recorded duties · evidence: AI interaction or use notice, Notice catalogue, Notice wording approval

  Notice before use that an automated tool will make or substantially make the decision.

• supportsProcessAI governance lead · continuous
  AI system inventory and classification

  Serves 13 recorded duties · evidence: AI system register, Risk-tier classification sign-off, AI intake and classification procedure

  Knowing which systems make significant decisions is the starting point for the notice.

Templates that cover this duty

Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.

• AI Agent Registry and Permission Matrix

  Register · XLSX and DOCX · v7

• EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Kit

  Kit · DOCX and XLSX · v47

• California ADMT and Risk Assessment Kit (CPPA)

  Kit · DOCX and XLSX · v1

• AI Model Card

  Kit · DOCX and XLSX · v5

All 7 templates that cover it →

What evidence would a reviewer expect?

Frequently asked questions

Cite this record

AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Give consumers a Pre-use Notice before using automated decision-making technology for a significant decision (California CPPA automated decision-making rules)” [AIPT-OBL-0118, not yet verified]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0118 (accessed 12 November 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.

Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0118: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.

Cite the official text alongside it: CPPA announcement: regulations approved by the Office of Administrative Law, California Privacy Protection Agency, https://cppa.ca.gov/regulations/pdf/ccpa_updates_cyber_risk_admt_appr_text.pdf.

@misc{aipolicytracker2026_giveconsumersapreusenoti,
  author       = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
  title        = {{Give consumers a Pre-use Notice before using automated decision-making technology for a significant decision (California CPPA automated decision-making rules)}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-ccpa-admt-pre-use-notice}},
  url          = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-ccpa-admt-pre-use-notice},
  urldate      = {2026-11-12},
  note         = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 12 November 2026}
}

Change history

Similar obligations in other instruments

• Answer consumers' requests to access information about how automated decision-making technology was used about them — California CPPA automated decision-making rules, California (United States)
• Tell users at the start of an AI companion interaction, and at least every three hours, that they are not communicating with a human — New York AI companion safeguards, New York (United States)
• Tell users that an AI companion chatbot is artificially generated and not human, at the start and at least every three hours — Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225), Washington State (United States)
• Where the user is known to be a minor or the chatbot is directed to minors, repeat the not-human notice at least every hour — Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225), Washington State (United States)
• Publish the self-harm protocol and the number of crisis referral notifications issued in the preceding calendar year — Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225), Washington State (United States)
• Disclose AI interaction and label synthetic content — EU AI Act, European Union
• Employers must inform workers and their representatives before using high-risk AI at work — EU AI Act, European Union
• Providers of generative AI must mark synthetic output as artificially generated in a machine-readable way — EU AI Act, European Union