Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

Where the user is known to be a minor or the chatbot is directed to minors, repeat the not-human notice at least every hour

Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225), ESHB 2225 (Chapter 168, Laws of 2026), sec. 4(1)(a), (2) and (3)

Pending review · linked to the official source, waiting for a reviewer to confirm it (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
What this label means
Verified
— a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
Pending review
— linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
Source-linked
— linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
Verification policy and current standing · a factual check, not legal advice.
Record updated on 12 Nov 2026 · Summary · official source last checked
On this page 8 sections

In brief

Where the user is known to be a minor or the chatbot is directed to minors, repeat the not-human notice at least every hour is a legal requirement under the Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225) in Washington State (United States) (ESHB 2225 (Chapter 168, Laws of 2026), sec. 4(1)(a), (2) and (3)). It applies from 1 January 2027.

Nature
Legal requirement
Source reference
ESHB 2225 (Chapter 168, Laws of 2026), sec. 4(1)(a), (2) and (3)
Applies from
1 January 2027
Who it binds
Provider / developer, Deployer / user organisation
Evidence examples
2
Controls that meet it
1
Official source
Open official text
Verification
Pending review · source-linked

What does it require?

If the operator knows the user is a minor (under 18), or the AI companion chatbot is directed to minors, the operator must issue a clear and conspicuous notification that the chatbot is artificially generated and not human. It is given at the beginning of the interaction and at least every hour during continuous interaction, rather than the three-hour interval that applies to other users. The operator must take reasonable measures to stop the chatbot from claiming to be human, including when asked, and from producing output that conflicts with the notification.

Practical action

Where a user is known to be under 18, or the product is aimed at minors, switch the repeated AI notice to an interval of one hour or less, and apply the same safeguards against the chatbot claiming to be human.

Who does it apply to?

Applies from:

Which controls meet this duty?

Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.

  • satisfiesProcessProduct owner · at launch and on material change
    AI interaction and use disclosure notices

    Serves 23 recorded duties · evidence: AI interaction or use notice, Notice catalogue, Notice wording approval

    The more frequent not-human notice for minors.

Templates that cover this duty

Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.

All 7 templates that cover it →

What evidence would a reviewer expect?

Evidence examples
EvidenceTypeNotes
The configuration that applies the hourly notice to known minors and minor-directed productsdocument
Screenshots of the notice as shown to a minor's account at the start and after an hourdocument

Frequently asked questions

Is this a legal requirement?

Yes. It is a legal requirement under Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225) (ESHB 2225 (Chapter 168, Laws of 2026), sec. 4(1)(a), (2) and (3)).

When does this obligation apply?

It applies from 1 January 2027.

What evidence shows compliance?

A reviewer would expect: The configuration that applies the hourly notice to known minors and minor-directed products; Screenshots of the notice as shown to a minor's account at the start and after an hour.

Which controls satisfy this obligation?

AI interaction and use disclosure notices.

What should an organisation do in practice?

Where a user is known to be under 18, or the product is aimed at minors, switch the repeated AI notice to an interval of one hour or less, and apply the same safeguards against the chatbot claiming to be human.

Cite this record

AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Where the user is known to be a minor or the chatbot is directed to minors, repeat the not-human notice at least every hour (Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225))” [AIPT-OBL-0124, not yet verified]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0124 (accessed 12 November 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.

Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0124: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.

Cite the official text alongside it: Washington State Legislature: HB 2225 (2025-26) bill summary, Washington State Legislature, https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2025-26/Pdf/Bills/Session%20Laws/House/2225-S.SL.pdf.

BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_wheretheuserisknowntobea,
  author       = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
  title        = {{Where the user is known to be a minor or the chatbot is directed to minors, repeat the not-human notice at least every hour (Washington AI companion chatbot law (ESHB 2225))}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-washington-eshb-2225-minor-disclosure}},
  url          = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-washington-eshb-2225-minor-disclosure},
  urldate      = {2026-11-12},
  note         = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 12 November 2026}
}

Change history

No change to this record's tracked fields has been recorded since 15 October 2026, when field-level history began.

Similar obligations in other instruments

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.