Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

AI policy updates

AI policy updates

Summary

The last 30 days: 200 AI policy changes recorded across 2 jurisdictions. Each is dated, links to its official source, and shows what it means in practice.

Changes
200
Jurisdictions
2
Entered into force
0
Urgent or high impact
0

Summary of last 90 days last 30 days

Last updated · most recent change 7 Nov 2026

Reset

Latest changes (390)

Template v3 released: Colorado ADMT Law (SB 26-189) Notices

Dataset 3335c39da4b7 → 051ce01569fc. Sheet "Checklist": 0 → 5 rows (+5). Sheet "Dates": 0 → 2 rows (+2). Document: 5 → 29 blocks. Record citations: 0 → 12.

Practical impact: Organisations using the v3 file should download the new version; the README page in each file states which dataset it was built from.

Colorado ADMT Law (SB 26-189) Notices v3 Verified (reviewed by templates:build; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Template v2 released: Global AI Regulatory Applicability Matrix

Dataset 914895c3103e → 3335c39da4b7. Sheet "Deadlines": 22 → 23 rows (+1). Record citations: 64 → 65.

Practical impact: Organisations using the v2 file should download the new version; the README page in each file states which dataset it was built from.

Global AI Regulatory Applicability Matrix v2 Verified (reviewed by templates:build; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Template v2 released: AI System Technical Documentation

Dataset 914895c3103e → 3335c39da4b7. Sheet "Documentation duties": 10 → 11 rows (+1). Document: 87 → 85 blocks. Record citations: 20 → 21.

Practical impact: Organisations using the v2 file should download the new version; the README page in each file states which dataset it was built from.

AI System Technical Documentation v2 Verified (reviewed by templates:build; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Template v2 released: Colorado ADMT Law (SB 26-189) Notices

Dataset 914895c3103e → 3335c39da4b7. Sheet "Checklist": 10 → 0 rows (-10). Sheet "Dates": 3 → 0 rows (-3). Document: 103 → 5 blocks. Record citations: 31 → 0.

Practical impact: Organisations using the v2 file should download the new version; the README page in each file states which dataset it was built from.

Colorado AI Act Notices v2 Verified (reviewed by templates:build; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Template v2 released: NIST AI RMF ↔ EU AI Act ↔ ISO/IEC 42001 Crosswalk

Dataset 7c0835db52c1 → 3335c39da4b7. Sheet "Crosswalk": 108 → 98 rows (-10). Sheet "Coverage": 17 → 16 rows (-1). Record citations: 108 → 98.

Practical impact: Organisations using the v2 file should download the new version; the README page in each file states which dataset it was built from.

NIST AI RMF ↔ EU AI Act ↔ ISO/IEC 42001 Crosswalk v2 Verified (reviewed by templates:build; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Template v2 released: ISO/IEC 42001 Gap Assessment and Statement of Applicability

Dataset 914895c3103e → 3335c39da4b7.

Practical impact: Organisations using the v2 file should download the new version; the README page in each file states which dataset it was built from.

ISO/IEC 42001 Gap Assessment and Statement of Applicability v2 Verified (reviewed by templates:build; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Template v2 released: AI Agent Registry and Permission Matrix

Dataset 914895c3103e → 3335c39da4b7. Sheet "Oversight duties": 34 → 35 rows (+1). Document: 53 → 52 blocks. Record citations: 42 → 43.

Practical impact: Organisations using the v2 file should download the new version; the README page in each file states which dataset it was built from.

AI Agent Registry and Permission Matrix v2 Verified (reviewed by templates:build; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Template v2 released: AI Incident Response Playbook and Log

Dataset 914895c3103e → 3335c39da4b7. Sheet "Incident duties": 9 → 7 rows (-2). Document: 69 → 57 blocks. Record citations: 256 → 252.

Practical impact: Organisations using the v2 file should download the new version; the README page in each file states which dataset it was built from.

AI Incident Response Playbook and Log v2 Verified (reviewed by templates:build; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Template v2 released: Human Oversight Procedure

Dataset 914895c3103e → 3335c39da4b7. Sheet "Oversight duties": 8 → 9 rows (+1). Document: 60 → 65 blocks. Record citations: 16 → 18.

Practical impact: Organisations using the v2 file should download the new version; the README page in each file states which dataset it was built from.

Human Oversight Procedure v2 Verified (reviewed by templates:build; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Template v2 released: AI Impact Assessment

Dataset 914895c3103e → 3335c39da4b7. Sheet "Duties by jurisdiction": 7 → 6 rows (-1). Document: 54 → 48 blocks. Record citations: 14 → 12.

Practical impact: Organisations using the v2 file should download the new version; the README page in each file states which dataset it was built from.

AI Impact Assessment v2 Verified (reviewed by templates:build; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Template v2 released: Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA)

Dataset 914895c3103e → 3335c39da4b7. Sheet "Impact-assessment duties": 7 → 6 rows (-1). Record citations: 8 → 7.

Practical impact: Organisations using the v2 file should download the new version; the README page in each file states which dataset it was built from.

Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) v2 Verified (reviewed by templates:build; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Template v2 released: EU AI Act Role and Risk Classifier

Dataset 7c0835db52c1 → 3335c39da4b7. Sheet "Dates": 7 → 9 rows (+2). Record citations: 51 → 53.

Practical impact: Organisations using the v2 file should download the new version; the README page in each file states which dataset it was built from.

EU AI Act Role and Risk Classifier v2 Verified (reviewed by templates:build; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Template v2 released: AI Risk Register (MIT AI Risk Repository taxonomy)

Dataset 914895c3103e → 3335c39da4b7. Sheet "Risk duties": 13 → 10 rows (-3). Record citations: 39 → 36.

Practical impact: Organisations using the v2 file should download the new version; the README page in each file states which dataset it was built from.

AI Risk Register (MIT AI Risk Repository taxonomy) v2 Verified (reviewed by templates:build; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Template v2 released: AI System Inventory

Dataset 914895c3103e → 3335c39da4b7. Sheet "Duties by role": 112 → 107 rows (-5). Document: 77 → 75 blocks. Record citations: 166 → 161.

Practical impact: Organisations using the v2 file should download the new version; the README page in each file states which dataset it was built from.

AI System Inventory v2 Verified (reviewed by templates:build; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
California (United States) Routine

California executive order directs work on AI oversight, including a frontier-model kill switch

The Governor issued an executive order asking a working group to recommend, within about two months, measures to strengthen California's AI safety and security laws, including whether developers of frontier models should maintain a shutdown capability and whether independent third parties should prepare safety plans. It creates no new obligations itself. Recorded from secondary reporting; confirm the order's number and text on the Governor's site.

Practical impact: No obligations yet; frontier-model developers should watch for the working group's recommendations.

Governor Newsom issues executive order to accelerate independent oversight and advance the creation of an AI kill switch Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
California (United States) High Adopted

California SB 1050 requires disclosure of AI synthetic performers in advertising

SB 1050 makes it unlawful to create or publish an advertisement that prominently includes a synthetic performer (a human-like digital voice, figure or representation created at least partly with generative AI and not depicting an identifiable person) without a clear and conspicuous disclosure. It takes effect on 1 January 2027. Recorded from secondary reporting; confirm against the chaptered text.

Practical impact: Advertisers and agencies should add a clear disclosure to any California advertisement that features an AI-generated performer from 1 January 2027.

SB-1050 False advertising: synthetic performers Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
California (United States) High Adopted

California signs SB 1119 on companion chatbots and children's safety

SB 1119 was chaptered (Chapter 190, Statutes of 2026). Operators must carry out a child-focused risk assessment before releasing a new or substantially modified companion chatbot from 1 July 2027, and commission child-safety audits by 1 January 2029. Recorded from search extracts of the legislature's pages.

Practical impact: Companion chatbot operators should plan a documented child-safety risk assessment before mid-2027 releases.

California chatbot child-safety law (SB 1119) California Legislative Information: SB 1119 (2025-2026) status Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Frequently asked questions

When was this page last updated?

The most recent change on record occurred on 7 November 2026. The page is generated from the records, so it changes the moment a new entry is logged; the "Last updated" time above is the last edit to any record shown.

Where do these updates come from?

Every entry is written from an official source — a journal, a regulator, a legislature — and links to it. Nothing here is a press summary of a press summary. Entries record what changed, the status after the change and what it means in practice.

How is "top story" decided?

By a published rule, not an editor's mood: impact level, whether the instrument is binding, whether it entered into force, whether a named reviewer confirmed the record, and how recent it is, added up into a score that orders the list. Each story shows its recorded impact level: urgent, high or routine.

Can I follow updates for one country?

Yes. Every jurisdiction with recorded changes has its own updates page and RSS feed, and the weekly digest can be limited to the jurisdictions you choose.

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.