Deployers must disclose deepfakes and AI-generated text published on matters of public interest
Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder EU AI Act, Article 50(4)
What this label means
- Verified
- — a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
- Pending review
- — linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
- Source-linked
- — linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
On this page 9 sections
In brief
Deployers must disclose deepfakes and AI-generated text published on matters of public interest is a legal requirement under the EU AI Act in the European Union (Article 50(4)). It applies from 2 August 2026. The record carries 2 evidence examples and mappings to 2 frameworks.
- Instrument
- EU AI Act
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Nature
- Legal requirement
- Source reference
- Article 50(4)
- Applies from
- 2 August 2026
- Who it binds
- Deployer / user organisation, Public authority / government body
- Evidence examples
- 2
- Framework mappings
- ISO/IEC 42001:2023, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0
- Controls that meet it
- 2
- Official source
- Open official text
- Verification
- Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026
What does it require?
A deployer that generates or manipulates image, audio or video content that is a deep fake must disclose that the content has been artificially generated or manipulated, with lighter treatment for evidently artistic, creative, satirical or fictional works so that the disclosure does not spoil the work. A deployer that publishes AI-generated text to inform the public on matters of public interest must disclose this unless the text passed human review or editorial control and someone holds editorial responsibility. The disclosure must reach people clearly at the latest at first exposure.
Practical action
Adopt a labelling standard for published synthetic media and a newsroom rule that AI-drafted public-interest text is either labelled or editorially signed off.
Who does it apply to?
Any organisation publishing deepfakes or AI-generated public-interest text, including media, marketing and public bodies.
Applies from:
Which controls meet this duty?
Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.
-
satisfiesTechnical measureEngineering lead · continuousSynthetic content labelling and provenance marking
Serves 5 recorded duties · evidence: Content labelling and provenance standard, Watermark and provenance robustness test, Visible AI-generated content label
User-facing labels on deepfakes and public-interest text.
-
supportsProcessAI system owner · once per ai systemHuman oversight design and override procedure
Serves 12 recorded duties · evidence: Human oversight and override procedure, Human-involvement design rationale, Overseer training completion
Editorial control that lifts the text-disclosure duty.
Templates that cover this duty
Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.
- EU AI Act Role and Risk Classifier
Checklist · XLSX · v4
- AI Agent Registry and Permission Matrix
Register · XLSX and DOCX · v6
- EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Kit
Kit · DOCX and XLSX · v44
- ISO/IEC 42001 Gap Assessment and Statement of Applicability
Assessment · XLSX · v3
What evidence would a reviewer expect?
| Evidence | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Synthetic media labelling standard | document | |
| Editorial sign-off record for AI-drafted text | record |
Framework mappings
Original editorial crosswalks. They cite clause numbers only and reproduce no standard text; confidence reflects how direct the mapping is.
See every European Union duty mapped this way →
| Framework | Reference | Note | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | Annex A.9.2, A.8.5 | Responsible-use processes and information to interested parties. | low |
| NIST AI RMF 1.0 | GOVERN 5.1, MANAGE 4.1 | Transparency to end users; NIST AI 600-1 content provenance. | medium |
Frequently asked questions
Is this a legal requirement?
Yes. It is a legal requirement under EU AI Act (Article 50(4)).
Who must comply with this obligation?
Any organisation publishing deepfakes or AI-generated public-interest text, including media, marketing and public bodies.
When does this obligation apply?
It applies from 2 August 2026.
What evidence shows compliance?
A reviewer would expect: Synthetic media labelling standard; Editorial sign-off record for AI-drafted text.
Which frameworks map to this obligation?
It is mapped to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A.9.2, A.8.5, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 GOVERN 5.1, MANAGE 4.1. These are editorial crosswalks with a stated confidence, not official mappings.
Which controls satisfy this obligation?
Synthetic content labelling and provenance marking; Human oversight design and override procedure.
What should an organisation do in practice?
Adopt a labelling standard for published synthetic media and a newsroom rule that AI-drafted public-interest text is either labelled or editorially signed off.
Cite this record
AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Deployers must disclose deepfakes and AI-generated text published on matters of public interest (EU AI Act)” [AIPT-OBL-0041, verified 26 September 2026]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0041 (accessed 8 November 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.
Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0041: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.
Cite the official text alongside it: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, Official Journal of the European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj.
BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_deployersmustdisclosedee,
author = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
title = {{Deployers must disclose deepfakes and AI-generated text published on matters of public interest (EU AI Act)}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-50-4-deepfake-and-public-interest-text-disclosure}},
url = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-50-4-deepfake-and-public-interest-text-disclosure},
urldate = {2026-11-08},
note = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 8 November 2026}
}
Change history
No change to this record's tracked fields has been recorded since 15 October 2026, when field-level history began.
Similar obligations in other instruments
- Employers must inform workers and their representatives before using high-risk AI at work — EU AI Act, European Union
- Disclose AI interaction and label synthetic content — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers must tell natural persons that a high-risk AI system is used in decisions about them — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers of emotion recognition or biometric categorisation must inform exposed persons — EU AI Act, European Union
- Providers of generative AI must mark synthetic output as artificially generated in a machine-readable way — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers must explain individual decisions taken with high-risk AI on request — EU AI Act, European Union
- Frontier developers must publish a transparency report before deploying a new frontier model — California SB 53, California (United States)
- Provide deployers with clear instructions for use — EU AI Act, European Union
Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.