Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

AI policy updates

AI policy updates

Summary

The last 90 days: 242 AI policy changes recorded across 3 jurisdictions, of which 1 concerned binding law, 4 were rated high impact. Each is dated, links to its official source, and shows what it means in practice.

Changes
242
Jurisdictions
3
Entered into force
0
Urgent or high impact
4

Summary of last 90 days last 30 days

Last updated · most recent change 7 Nov 2026

Reset

Latest changes (390)

California (United States) High Adopted

California signs child-safety laws covering companion chatbots and social media

The Governor signed a package of child-safety bills that, among other things, require risk assessments before new companion-chatbot rollouts, add penalties for harm to children and restrict toys that include a companion chatbot. According to the announcement and secondary reporting, most provisions take effect on 1 January 2027 and the companion-chatbot safeguards on 1 July 2027. Recorded from secondary reporting; confirm each bill against its enrolled text.

Practical impact: Providers of companion chatbots available to minors in California should plan risk assessments and safeguards for the 2027 dates.

Governor Newsom signs the strongest child safety chatbot and social media laws in the nation Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
California (United States) High Adopted

California enacts an AI audit framework with SB 813 and AB 1405

The Governor signed SB 813, under which the Government Operations Agency sets criteria by 1 January 2028 for designating qualified AI auditors as independent verification organisations, and AB 1405, which creates an online AI Auditor Registry by 1 January 2029, after which a covered AI audit may be offered only by a registered auditor meeting independence and integrity standards. Recorded from secondary reporting; confirm against the enrolled bills.

Practical impact: Organisations that commission AI audits for California compliance should plan to use auditors that register under AB 1405 once the registry opens.

Governor Newsom signs first-in-the-nation AI safeguards to protect Californians Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
United States Routine Proposed

House members introduce the AI Tax and Work Protection Act (H.R. 10044), an excise tax on AI tokens

H.R. 10044 would tax large AI companies on the value of the tokens their models process or on AI-service revenue, whichever is higher, with a rate that rises automatically as unemployment climbs, and would create a Work Protection Administration in the Department of Labor to fund jobs. Introduced by Representatives Sara Jacobs, Greg Casar and Valerie Foushee. Recorded from secondary reporting; confirm on Congress.gov.

Practical impact: No obligations; a proposal to watch in the economic-transition tracker.

H.R. 10044, AI Tax and Work Protection Act Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
European Union High at the time Partially applicable

EU AI Act general application begins; Article 50 transparency duties now apply

The general application date in Article 113 arrived. Chatbot disclosure, synthetic-content marking and deepfake labelling under Article 50 now apply; the high-risk obligations do not, having been deferred by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744. Recorded from secondary reporting; confirm against the Official Journal text.

Practical impact: Label AI interactions and synthetic content now; high-risk conformity work runs to the deferred dates.

EU AI Act Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 113 as amended Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
European Union Urgent at the time Partially applicable

EU Digital Omnibus on AI enters into force, moving high-risk AI Act duties to December 2027 and August 2028

Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, published in the Official Journal on 24 July 2026, entered into force on 27 July 2026. It amends Article 113 of the AI Act so that the Chapter III high-risk obligations apply from 2 December 2027 for stand-alone Annex III systems and from 2 August 2028 for AI embedded in Annex I products, adds two Article 5 prohibitions applying from 2 December 2026, and leaves the 2 August 2026 general application and Article 50 transparency dates in place. Recorded from concordant secondary reporting; confirm against the Official Journal text.

Practical impact: Re-plan high-risk conformity work to the December 2027 and August 2028 dates; transparency duties under Article 50 still applied from 2 August 2026.

EU AI Act Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus on AI) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Malaysia Routine

Ministry of Digital begins engagement and public consultation on the AI Governance Bill

Milestone recorded for Artificial Intelligence (Malaysia): Ministry of Digital begins engagement and public consultation on the AI Governance Bill. Recorded from the official source listed.

Artificial Intelligence Ministry of Digital begins engagement and public consultation on the AI Governance Bill Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Illinois (United States) High at the time Adopted

Illinois enacts the AI Safety Measures Act (SB 315) on frontier-model safety and transparency

SB 315 became Public Act 104-0538. Large frontier developers must publish a frontier AI framework and transparency reports, report critical safety incidents to the state, protect whistleblowers and, from 2028, commission annual independent third-party audits. Recorded from search extracts of the ILGA bill status page.

Practical impact: Large frontier developers should map their California SB 53 framework to Illinois's audit requirement.

Illinois AI Safety Measures Act (SB 315) Illinois General Assembly: bill status of SB 315 (104th General Assembly) Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
United States Routine Proposed

Senator Sanders introduces the American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act (S. 4825)

S. 4825 would levy a one-time tax, payable in equity, on AI companies with more than USD 200 million in annual sales, placing the shares in a public fund managed by an independent commission and paying dividends to residents. Introduced and referred; no committee action recorded. Recorded from secondary reporting and the sponsor's press release; confirm on Congress.gov.

Practical impact: No obligations; a proposal to watch in the economic-transition tracker.

S. 4825, American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
South Africa Routine

Withdrawal gazetted (Notice 3978 of 2026, Gazette No. 54840)

Milestone recorded for Draft South Africa National Artificial Intelligence (South Africa): Withdrawal gazetted (Notice 3978 of 2026, Gazette No. 54840). Recorded from the official source listed.

Draft South Africa National Artificial Intelligence Withdrawal gazetted (Notice 3978 of 2026, Gazette No. 54840) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Connecticut (United States) High at the time Adopted

Connecticut signs SB 5 on online safety, with frontier-developer whistleblower duties

Public Act 26-15 was signed. Its frontier provisions, effective 1 October 2026, protect whistleblowers and require large frontier developers to set up an internal reporting process and report to their boards. Recorded from search extracts of the General Assembly's pages.

Practical impact: Large frontier developers should have an anonymous internal reporting process by 1 January 2027.

Connecticut online safety and frontier AI law (SB 5) Public Act 26-15 (SB 5) Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Singapore Routine

Update to the National AI Strategy released with 10 refreshed priorities

Milestone recorded for National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2.0 (Singapore): Update to the National AI Strategy released with 10 refreshed priorities. Recorded from the official source listed.

National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2.0 Update to the National AI Strategy released with 10 refreshed priorities Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Colorado (United States) Urgent at the time Adopted

Colorado repeals and replaces its AI Act with SB 26-189, effective 1 January 2027

The Governor signed SB 26-189, which repeals and re-enacts the Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205) before its delayed 30 June 2026 effective date. The replacement law narrows the scope to automated decision-making technology that materially influences consequential decisions, drops the duty of care, impact assessments, the risk-management programme and Attorney General notification, and adds advance notice, adverse-decision disclosure, meaningful human review, three-year record keeping and developer documentation duties. Recorded from secondary reporting; confirm against the enrolled bill.

Practical impact: Stop building to the SB 24-205 impact-assessment and risk-programme requirements; plan notice, adverse-decision disclosure, human review, record keeping and developer documentation for consequential decisions from 1 January 2027.

Colorado ADMT law (SB 26-189) SB26-189 Automated Decision-Making Technology Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Indonesia Routine

Government completes inter-ministerial finalisation of the roadmap and ethics draft regulations

Milestone recorded for Rancangan Peraturan Presiden tentang Peta Jalan Kecerdasan Artifisial Nasional 2026-2029 (Indonesia): Government completes inter-ministerial finalisation of the roadmap and ethics draft regulations. Recorded from the official source listed.

South Africa Routine

Minister Malatsi announces withdrawal of the draft policy

Milestone recorded for Draft South Africa National Artificial Intelligence (South Africa): Minister Malatsi announces withdrawal of the draft policy. Recorded from the official source listed.

Draft South Africa National Artificial Intelligence Minister Malatsi announces withdrawal of the draft policy Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Ghana Routine

Official launch in Accra; Minister's opening remarks published

Milestone recorded for Ghana National Artificial Intelligence Strategy (Ghana): Official launch in Accra; Minister's opening remarks published. Recorded from the official source listed.

Ghana National Artificial Intelligence Strategy Official launch in Accra; Minister's opening remarks published Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Japan Routine

Ver1.2 published

Milestone recorded for AI Guidelines for Business (Japan): Ver1.2 published. Recorded from the official source listed.

AI Guidelines for Business Ver1.2 published Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
New York (United States) High at the time

New York signs the chapter amendment that rewrites the RAISE Act

The chapter amendment to the RAISE Act was signed as chapter 96 of 2026. Its sponsor memo says it repeals the underlying 2025 chapter and establishes a new regulatory regime aligned more closely with California SB 53. Recorded from search extracts of the Senate bill page; the effective date was not confirmed.

Practical impact: Frontier developers should read the RAISE Act as amended, not the 2025 text.

New York RAISE Act (frontier model safety) New York State Senate: bill S8828 Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Indonesia Routine

Inter-ministerial plenary discusses draft Perpres on National AI Roadmap 2026-2029

Milestone recorded for Rancangan Peraturan Presiden tentang Peta Jalan Kecerdasan Artifisial Nasional 2026-2029 (Indonesia): Inter-ministerial plenary discusses draft Perpres on National AI Roadmap 2026-2029. Recorded from the official source listed.

Rancangan Peraturan Presiden tentang Peta Jalan Kecerdasan Artifisial Nasional 2026-2029 Inter-ministerial plenary discusses draft Perpres on National AI Roadmap 2026-2029 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Singapore Routine Voluntary standard

Singapore launches a Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI

IMDA launched a voluntary governance framework for AI agents at the World Economic Forum, covering upfront risk bounding, human accountability, technical controls across the agent lifecycle and end-user responsibility, and said it was developing testing guidelines for agentic applications. Recorded from search extracts of IMDA and MDDI pages.

Practical impact: Organisations deploying AI agents can use it as a reference for governance and controls.

Singapore agentic AI governance framework New Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
South Korea Routine

Act enters into force

Milestone recorded for Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of a Foundation for Trust (South Korea): Act enters into force. Recorded from the official source listed.

AI Basic Act Act enters into force Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Ontario (Canada) Routine In force

Ontario job postings must disclose AI screening

The Working for Workers Four Act provisions took effect requiring employers with 25 or more employees to state in public job postings whether AI is used to screen, assess or select applicants.

Practical impact: Add an AI-use statement to every public job posting for Ontario roles.

Ontario Working for Workers Four Act (AI disclosure in job postings) Bill 149 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Illinois (United States) High at the time In force

Illinois AI-in-employment provisions take effect

Public Act 103-0804 became effective: discriminatory AI use in employment decisions is a civil-rights violation and employers must notify employees of AI use.

Practical impact: Employers must have notices and bias testing in place for AI tools affecting Illinois workers.

Illinois HB 3773 (AI in employment, Human Rights Act amendment) HB 3773 / Public Act 103-0804 Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Texas (United States) High at the time In force

Texas TRAIGA takes effect

The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act became effective, with Attorney General enforcement after a 60-day cure period.

Practical impact: Prohibited-intent screening, government disclosure and sandbox applications are now live requirements in Texas.

Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA) HB 149 (89R) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Egypt Routine

NCAI mandate expanded to AI, Quantum Computing and Emerging Technologies (January 2026)

Milestone recorded for National AI Strategy (Egypt): NCAI mandate expanded to AI, Quantum Computing and Emerging Technologies (January 2026). Recorded from the official source listed.

National AI Strategy NCAI mandate expanded to AI, Quantum Computing and Emerging Technologies (January 2026) Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
California (United States) High at the time In force

California SB 53 frontier-model transparency duties become operative

Most provisions of the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act took effect, including the duty to publish a frontier AI framework and report critical safety incidents.

Practical impact: Large frontier developers should now have a published framework and incident-reporting process.

California SB 53 SB 53 Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act Verified (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)

Frequently asked questions

When was this page last updated?

The most recent change on record occurred on 7 November 2026. The page is generated from the records, so it changes the moment a new entry is logged; the "Last updated" time above is the last edit to any record shown.

Where do these updates come from?

Every entry is written from an official source — a journal, a regulator, a legislature — and links to it. Nothing here is a press summary of a press summary. Entries record what changed, the status after the change and what it means in practice.

How is "top story" decided?

By a published rule, not an editor's mood: impact level, whether the instrument is binding, whether it entered into force, whether a named reviewer confirmed the record, and how recent it is, added up into a score that orders the list. Each story shows its recorded impact level: urgent, high or routine.

Can I follow updates for one country?

Yes. Every jurisdiction with recorded changes has its own updates page and RSS feed, and the weekly digest can be limited to the jurisdictions you choose.

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.