Employers must inform workers and their representatives before using high-risk AI at work
Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder EU AI Act, Article 26(7)
What this label means
- Verified
- — a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
- Pending review
- — linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
- Source-linked
- — linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
On this page 9 sections
In brief
Employers must inform workers and their representatives before using high-risk AI at work is a legal requirement under the EU AI Act in the European Union (Article 26(7)). It applies from 2 December 2027. The record carries 2 evidence examples and mappings to 2 frameworks.
- Instrument
- EU AI Act
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Nature
- Legal requirement
- Source reference
- Article 26(7)
- Applies from
- 2 December 2027
- Who it binds
- Deployer / user organisation, Public authority / government body
- Evidence examples
- 2
- Framework mappings
- ISO/IEC 42001:2023, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0
- Controls that meet it
- 2
- Official source
- Open official text
- Verification
- Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026
What does it require?
Before putting a high-risk AI system into service or using it at the workplace, a deployer that is an employer must tell the workers' representatives and the affected workers that they will be subject to the system. The information is given following the procedures and rules on informing workers and their representatives under Union and national law and practice, which may include works-council consultation.
Practical action
Add an AI Act notice step to the HR technology change process and consult the works council where national law requires it.
Who does it apply to?
Employers deploying high-risk AI in recruitment, task allocation, performance monitoring or other employment uses listed in Annex III.
- Use cases
- AI in hiring and employment
Applies from:
Which controls meet this duty?
Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.
-
satisfiesProcessProduct owner · at launch and on material changeAI interaction and use disclosure notices
Serves 18 recorded duties · evidence: AI interaction or use notice, Notice catalogue, Notice wording approval
Workforce-facing notice before go-live.
-
supportsProcessAI system owner · once per ai systemAI impact and fundamental-rights impact assessment
Serves 11 recorded duties · evidence: AI impact assessment, Impact assessment approval, Impact assessment procedure and template
Identifies the affected worker groups to notify.
Templates that cover this duty
Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.
- EU AI Act Role and Risk Classifier
Checklist · XLSX · v4
- AI Agent Registry and Permission Matrix
Register · XLSX and DOCX · v6
- EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Kit
Kit · DOCX and XLSX · v44
- ISO/IEC 42001 Gap Assessment and Statement of Applicability
Assessment · XLSX · v3
What evidence would a reviewer expect?
| Evidence | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Worker and works-council notification | document | Dated notice describing the system, its purpose and the affected roles. |
| Consultation minutes | record |
Framework mappings
Original editorial crosswalks. They cite clause numbers only and reproduce no standard text; confidence reflects how direct the mapping is.
See every European Union duty mapped this way →
| Framework | Reference | Note | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | Annex A.8.5 | Information for interested parties. | medium |
| NIST AI RMF 1.0 | GOVERN 5.1, MAP 1.6 | Engagement with affected groups. | medium |
Frequently asked questions
Is this a legal requirement?
Yes. It is a legal requirement under EU AI Act (Article 26(7)).
Who must comply with this obligation?
Employers deploying high-risk AI in recruitment, task allocation, performance monitoring or other employment uses listed in Annex III.
When does this obligation apply?
It applies from 2 December 2027.
What evidence shows compliance?
A reviewer would expect: Worker and works-council notification; Consultation minutes.
Which frameworks map to this obligation?
It is mapped to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A.8.5, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 GOVERN 5.1, MAP 1.6. These are editorial crosswalks with a stated confidence, not official mappings.
Which controls satisfy this obligation?
AI interaction and use disclosure notices; AI impact and fundamental-rights impact assessment.
What should an organisation do in practice?
Add an AI Act notice step to the HR technology change process and consult the works council where national law requires it.
Cite this record
AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Employers must inform workers and their representatives before using high-risk AI at work (EU AI Act)” [AIPT-OBL-0034, verified 26 September 2026]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0034 (accessed 8 November 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.
Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0034: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.
Cite the official text alongside it: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, Official Journal of the European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj.
BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_employersmustinformworke,
author = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
title = {{Employers must inform workers and their representatives before using high-risk AI at work (EU AI Act)}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-26-7-worker-information}},
url = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-26-7-worker-information},
urldate = {2026-11-08},
note = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 8 November 2026}
}
Change history
No change to this record's tracked fields has been recorded since 15 October 2026, when field-level history began.
Similar obligations in other instruments
- Providers of generative AI must mark synthetic output as artificially generated in a machine-readable way — EU AI Act, European Union
- Disclose AI interaction and label synthetic content — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers of emotion recognition or biometric categorisation must inform exposed persons — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers must disclose deepfakes and AI-generated text published on matters of public interest — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers must tell natural persons that a high-risk AI system is used in decisions about them — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers must explain individual decisions taken with high-risk AI on request — EU AI Act, European Union
- Frontier developers must publish a transparency report before deploying a new frontier model — California SB 53, California (United States)
- Provide deployers with clear instructions for use — EU AI Act, European Union
Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.